Detroit Vs Japan

I won't argue with that one bit.

Well, I think people bought Toyotas in the 70's for several reasons: First was gas mileage. Second was immediate availability of gas saving vehicles. Third was the slow response to the market by GM, Ford, and Chrysler. Fourth was how much nicer their small cars were compared to Mavericks, Pintos, Chevettes, and Omnis. Fifth was price. Hondas and Toyotas were very inexpensive cars back then.

There was a lot of bloat in Detroit. During the 1970's, according to Autoline Detroit, GM hired tons of new workers, mostly unnecessarily. The bloat was just overwhelming, and the hierarchy to support such size was full of bureaucracy. It was just a tremendous mess. Since WWII, we went from many competitors on the market such as Nash, Packard, Hudson, Studebacker, and others to the Big 3 and AMC. They got fat and lazy.

I really don't think that the UAW had much to do with the problem. It was poor management and an inability to respond in a timely manner to changing market conditions. They blamed government regulation and they simply didn't take the foreign threat seriously.

Reply to
Ruel Smith
Loading thread data ...

I believe American cars were much better relative to the rest of the world when we had both the majors and the independents. It's no accident that the most reliable and toughest fifties and sixties vehicles made in America with the highest percentage still on the road and with loyal actitvist owner's clubs are Studebaker and International Harvester. (Jeep was part of an independent then too.) In the late sixties and early seventies American cars sucked. The Vega was a rust ball with an engine that self-destructed in some cases in nine months, the Pinto would explode if rear ended (but ironically had some good drivelines!), on and on.

Reply to
calcerise

Reply to
L.W.( ßill ) Hughes III

ditto. in the end i dont suppose it matters. those who care about what they do are going to succeed at it with or without union support.

Reply to
Nathan W. Collier

The Mopars weren't inferior in terms of engine and transmission quality. They were inferior in the way the interiors were put together, the way stuff would fall off, the AC would quit because of the little stuff like switches,etc. GM figured out that those "little things" were what really mattered and got it right. GM electrics, interiors, climate control, were best of industry. AMC and Mopar were often great basic cars with little annoyances. Mechanically intelligent people could fix them, but most people don't. They just get rid of it.

Reply to
calcerise

WHO are you calling a traitor, and WHY?

Reply to
calcerise

Reply to
L.W.( ßill ) Hughes III

Perhaps. But I've recently seen it suggested that the reason that there's so many 40s and 50s Willys vehicles coming out of barns with

30,000 miles on the clock is that they were underpowered, unreliable, broken down, were parked and forgotten as not worth the bother.

Consider this: How often do you need to tune a modern computer-controlled ignition, fuel-injected engine? How often did you need to tune a points-and-condensor ignition?

snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com wrote:

Reply to
Lee Ayrton

A day is about the number of hours between major OH a smallblock will run at 7000 rpm continuous, even if it's blueprinted and balanced with four bolt mains, forged crank, and fully prepped rods.

Reply to
calcerise

A day is about the number of hours between major OH a smallblock will run at 7000 rpm continuous, even if it's blueprinted and balanced with four bolt mains, forged crank, and fully prepped rods.

Reply to
L.W.( ßill ) Hughes III

You put a SB Chev on a generator or a prop drive and run it 100 _continuous_ hours-feeding it cool clean oil and glycol-at 7000 rpm, I'll believe that.

Reply to
calcerise

Reply to
L.W.( ßill ) Hughes III

Bill,

A few years ago my parents were looking for a replacement for their 16 year old car. The US automakers no longer made a 4 door hatchback like they wanted. When I mentioned a model produced by a Japanese company my father nixed the idea by saying "I haven't gotten over WWII yet, it has only been

55 years".

Billy

Reply to
Billy Ray

Reply to
L.W.( ßill ) Hughes III

Bill,

In my '02 WJ 4 liter automatic I have no illumination on my transmission or transfer case shifters at night. I took the console apart a week or so ago and where I expected to find a couple burnt out bulbs there were no bulbs.

There is, however, a thin plastic sheet with 2 electric terminals that go to a small "black box" that then plugs into a part of the wiring harness at the aft end of the shifter mechanism..

Is that plastic sheet the lighting unit? Is there a proper test procedure?

Thanks in advance,

-billy

Reply to
Billy Ray

Billy Ray did pass the time by typing:

Your describing an EL (Electro Luminescent) panel. Inside the black box shoud be a step-up transformer. Measure at the box for 12V on the input.

Light reading

formatting link
Not so light reading.
formatting link
it's for the instrument panel) Since EL is darn near indestructable I'd be checking the fuses first.

Reply to
DougW

Doug,

Hopefully the fuse is the problem. Does anyone out there know which fuse controls the illumination? I haven't noticed any other electrics non-functional so I am assuming it is fused by itself.

-billy

Reply to
Billy Ray

Reply to
tim bur

I checked the owners manual and it had no mention of this alone. There are, of course, fuses for the other interior lights and gauges but the only thing that does not illuminate is the tranmission.& transfer case. I haven't been able to find my multi-meter so I can't check the unit voltage till I borrow one over the weekend.

-billy

Reply to
Billy Ray

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.