101s getting too common?

Sep 20, 2003 75 Replies

Many, many years ago, there was a girl in our local pub who was called Titanic ;-)

Martyn

Yeah go on tell me about all the men that went down on her too...

Brev

snip

snip

Not being one to ask for trouble, I'll thank you to keep this away from the other half Martyn! A number of years ago, I seem to remember a giant

8 wheel drive "Argocat" type vehicle called and Esarco or some thing like that. It was based on two landrover drive trains with front and rear axles steering IIRC. Food for thought, but in the mean the mean time, I'll make my escape while the going is good.

On or around Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:15:44 +0100, "Brevit" enlightened us thusly:

that subject line goes with my original posting, and the link referred to therein. Someone selling an 8x8 built out of mostly-landrover parts, from the looks of it.

On or around Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:26:38 +0100, "David French" enlightened us thusly:

well, mainly 'cos it's cheap. and if you go up in diameter as well (e.g.

33x12.5R15, say) then you do gain clearance under the diff as well.

I currently own the MWG 8x8 in the LRO advert. If there is anything you want to know about how it works then I'd be happy to chat about it. You don't have to want to buy it! It certainly would make an excellent expedition vehicle, but I have already got one. I thought it would be good in place of a 110 but it is too big for that.

I have scanned some of the brochure which has pictures of the transmission layout on

formatting link
David

Will you be bringing it to Donington?

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 '77 101FC Ambulance '95 Discovery V8i

formatting link

But that's the problem, we all *do* want to buy it.

Any more photos?

No we don't.

No, no, no, no, no....

Martyn

I'll look some out. The LRO photo is on

formatting link
but probably better qualitythat the little picture in the mag. David

I'm not listening, I'm not listening...

I know your (expensive and painful) game all too well by now, Mike.

Charlotte has your number...

Martyn

Yep, I reckon you could NEVER pull it off , IT wouldn't fit! And besides you don't REALLY want one. or you'd have it

;-)

I mean...just imagine it cruising down the motorway on the way to various events with an overfinch 5.2 fitted...which incidentally would NEVER fit either

;-)

Lee D

I dunno about that, but I'd give my right arm to crawl underneath it with a camera.

Alex

Nope. Most things I do with my right, but there are exceptions

Alex

One of those exceptions being taking photos if Dave agrees to your suggestion? :-)

Martyn

On or around Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:51:43 +0100, Mike Derrick enlightened us thusly:

that sounds a lot like the one which is for sale...

On or around Tue, 23 Sep 2003 06:20:52 +0100, Alex enlightened us thusly:

for some things you need both?

On or around Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:53:53 +0000 (UTC), snipped-for-privacy@bangor.ac.uk (D.P.Round) enlightened us thusly:

interesting.

couple of points occur to my thought: (don't necessarily expect you to know the answers, mind)

1) is the second (rear) transfer box standard, and if so, where do you get a left-handed one, or is it a re-working of a standard one?

2) the 2nd and 4th axles appear to be running backwards, do they have problems with lubrication, or are they modified?

There is a picture of the transmission in the brochure that I have partially scanned.

formatting link
If you have anydetailed questions from that I'll try and answer them. UnfortunatelyI don't have a digital camera. I've forgotten to bring in any more pictures too - a chap came to look at it this morning which didn't leave me a lot of time. I'll try again tomorrow.

If whoever (sorry I've lost the associations) really wanted a look underneath wants to get in contact with me I'm sure it can be arranged. Right arm not required!

David

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required