Oh the temptation! Suits you sir... Ooooo it does look good on you.
:0)
Lee D
-- "I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)
so Lee_D was, like...
That engine will never move a lump like that.
Not 1981 - that was when Marshalls put the body on.
Not a "Webesto" heater, either, it's an Eberspacher
Partly stripped, fair paint job, overall not too bad.
Certainly at the top of its money.
Bit worried about the engine capacity, though... :-)
Indeed, "somewhat underpowered" would be an understatement...
On or around Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:06:25 +0100, Lee_D enlightened us thusly:
nah; I don't want an ambi. I might fancy a radbod, but what I really want is a GS and build a narrow ambi-esque body on it - same height as an ambi but same width as the normal body.
add a 3.9 and an auto box, and it'd be about right :-)
that's assuming I have one at all, which ain't likely at the moment, unless I win the lottery or something.
Mine is on a 1981 X plate too. who decided that a load of the ambis were 1981's?
Mines on an A plate :-)
There are a number of very vague ways to get this. Depends really on how you / DVLA want to look at it. Technically none can have such a plate as it should be based upon the date of manufacture. However, it can sort of be argued that the ambi was manufactured in [whatever] year. It's also been known for a date plate to be issued relating to the 'date of release', which is very, very wrong and thankfully rare.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required