LogBook

Jul 23, 2003 13 Replies

I have just been looking at a landover for sale, the V5 states "4 x 4 light duty" is that standard?



Currently seem to have misplaced my own, I just cant remember!


I remember that my 90 had 2 dorr coupe on the log book.

Dan

You'd be surprised how many different things appear on the v5. I have on my 4 landrovers: "2 Axle Rigid Body 4x4 Light Utility" (88" SWB) "109 4-cyl Light 4x4 Utilitty" (109" IIa) "109 6-cyl Light 4x4 Utility" (109" 2.6 III) and "2 axle rigid body Van" (101 FC Ambulance)

It seems to be pretty flexible

Alex

Our log book says Light Duty on the Series 3

M Landrover 90 Defender Saloon Private / Light Goods (PLG)

I see the DVLA have thier finger on the pulse then - cutting vehicle fraud and crime at a stroke ......... NOT :-|

ps

There is no bar in the saloon !!

mine says "4x4 88" light utility"

On 2003-07-24 snipped-for-privacy@tesco.net said: >"Rog" wrote in message >> I have just been looking at a landover for sale, the V5 states "4 >x 4 light duty" is that standard? >mine says "4x4 88" light utility" Mine (2A T/cab) just says "2 axle rigid body". Alan

A quick question Alex, do you get charged "van" rates at tolls (Severn Bridge, QE2 bridge, etc) in the 101?

When the new Severn Bridge was opened I got into quite an qrguement over how much we should pay for 101's to use the bridge. The operators insisted it was a van - they wanted to charge LGV rates at first - whilst I argued it was Land Rover and should therefore be charged the same as our 90 and 110's. They won :-(

For the ambulances we argued that they were emergency vehicles and should be exempt from the tolls. I was gob-smacked to discover that the local ambulance services have to pay to use the bridge! This may have changed since.

Regards Steve G

remove the nospam to email me

I believe if you use a motorbike to cross it now, its free.

I think van is defined by either:

Vehicle with no auxilliary passenger seating and an enclosed cargo space (Discovery Vans, all CDVs)

or

Vehicle over 35CWT laden weight whos primary purpose is not the carrying of passengers

This would seem to be the only way the definitions fit. I suspect that the

101 would get caught under the over 35CWT bit.

Paul

I've used the Severn bridge using three different configurations:

Transit Van towing 2 tonne machine trailer Mitsubishi pickup towing machine trailer Fully laden Range Rover towing fully laden 2.6 tone horse trailer

Having paid commercial rates on the first two I was fully prepared to cough up the same for the Range Ruster as the all up weight, trailer weight and total length of the combination was greater than the first two - nope, car rate - big smile from the Scotsman here and off we went

Graeme

p.s. why do they not charge you to leave Wales??

Hmm. Sounds like the attitude of the council tip round here.

Oi fink it's a commercial so you ain't comin in ere

Alex

On or around Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:28:00 +0100, "Graeme" enlightened us thusly:

we want to make it easier for the Saes (think Sassenach) to leave...

seriously, there used to be 2-way tolls, but that requires more people and creates more congestion. Making it 1-way, they can use all the lanes except

2 or 3 to take tolls, when it's busy.

mind you, if you're me, you go out over the bridge and back through Gloucester :-)

I don't think it's value for money charging anything to enter wales.....

Alex

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required