Having recently bought a Seat Inca 1.9 SDI van, I was expecting the fuel economy to be better than I'm experiencing. Took it back to Berkshire from Bradford, and done various trips in it (mainly motorway, sitting at
70-80mph), and I've only averaged 49mpg. Checked the oil and it's a little low, and I'll be doing an oil change (and air filter + fuel filter) over the weekend, so this should ensure that things are running reasonably optimally. Thing is, I was hoping to average around 55mpg in it. Now I know that's no massive difference, and the shape of the van is hardly the most aerodynamic shape, but can I expect better economy at lower speeds?The reason I bought the van is because the work I do is 90% city traffic, rarely going much above 30-40mph except on the motorway on the way in and out. A few questions:
Am I right in thinking that for lower speed driving (i.e. 40mph max) the detrimental effect the shape of the van will have on fuel economy will be negligible?
The gearing is fairly high for a diesel, probably because it's normally aspirated, and just not very powerful. It's doing 3000rpm in top gear (5th) on the motorway - am I right in assuming that the economy around town (providing there's not too much heavy traffic) should be a reasonable amount better than sitting at 70-80 on the motorway? 3000rpm certainly doesn't feel very economical.
Anyway, time will tell - people's comments appreciated.
Cheers,
Peter