Smoothness of V6 compared to S6 engine.

formatting link

Reply to
DavidR
Loading thread data ...

Mmmm. Not sure about that. Cars idle at much the same engine speed, but the noise levels are very different. Valve train clatter a key culprit.

Reply to
RJH

There was a 2 cylinder 2 stroke with a piston supercharger at 90° between the power cylinders. There are also W and some radial triples.

formatting link
radial 5's
formatting link
radial 9's
formatting link
formatting link

Reply to
Peter Hill

Lots of reading here on consecutive pages

formatting link

Reply to
The Other Mike

Well I heard a Bentley V12 coupe the other day on M4; it sounded like a thunder boom when he overtook me. Not what you would expect from supposedly the best car in the world.

Reply to
johannes

Yeah, interesting engine that one, but lots of complexity due to balancer shafts. Possibly loss of efficientcy due to all the extra gear? But on the other hand, less internal friction than a 3L V6.

These days... there seems to be a convergence towards the transverse 4, like a natural selection of an engineering solution. In older times there were more interesting variations, some of which died out.

Possibly due to the manufacturing advantages, as the whole drivertrain can be assembled as one modular and compact unit. We were then bombarded with statements that FWD was much much much better than RWD..

Reply to
johannes

Thanks Peter, I had no idea there were radial-powered motorcycles. That Goggomobil is just nuts.

BTW, the rotary engines I referred to were not the Wankel type, they were the same layout as radials but rotated with propeller attached about a fixed crankshaft. A certain WO Bentley designed aluminium versions.

Reply to
Ramsman

Here's a handful of clues for you...

  1. Bentley don't make any V12s, and never have.
  2. Many ContiGTs are v8.
  3. The owner almost certainly paid (considerably) extra for that exhaust.
  4. You're talking about a sports coupe, not a wafty bloaty barge.
  5. Stop digging yourself further into a pit of blatantly obvious cluelessness.
Reply to
Adrian

W12

formatting link

Reply to
johannes

Exactly.

And, in the context of the original question, see if you can guess why that might make a substantial difference.

Reply to
Adrian

It's going to wobble even with the offset crankpins. They have 12° offset to move the 72° W angle to an effective 60° to get even firing interval. But as it's 2 VR6's it has to have 3(6) crankpins 15° out of line from the other 3(6) to get even firing. So it can't be as perfectly smooth as an inline 6.

The exhaust probably has polite town and I'm an utter cad and bounder (footballer) very loud WOT valve.

Reply to
Peter Hill

Without question, the best engine would be a gas turbine/energy buffer/electric combination.

Reply to
DavidR

Far from a silly suggestion.

formatting link
formatting link
Toyota were playing with concepts back in the '70s.
formatting link
formatting link

Reply to
Adrian

Was it a V10 TDI, so 5 in line in each bank?

Reply to
Chris Bartram

No, it was the pikey-spec 2.5 straight five.

Reply to
Adrian

That would have originated with some wanker in a marketing suit getting it wrong.

Reply to
Grimly Curmudgeon

I read in a book, sometime in 1950's that cars inthe 21'st century would be driven by nuclear power and have a small reactor in the boot. They showed even a picture of a small round thing sticking out...

Reply to
johannes

You mean the Ford Nucleon

formatting link

Reply to
Mrcheerful
[...]

LOL, brill. Thanks for pic.

Reply to
johannes

Also a lot here:

formatting link

Reply to
johannes

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.