Drive a CLK500 before you do. I have tried to like the CLKs but the chassis
stiffness and the suspension are IMHO not in the same class as the SL. There
is more than the name that makes an SL cost twice as much. It may just be
the weight that makes a difference. The SL is quite a bit heavier than the
CLK despite being smaller. If you want to step up from the SL try the CL55
AMG. The suspension and chassis are more similar than the CLK. I drove one a
few weeks ago and was very impressed. You might be able to get a deal
because it is a "cold" car. There are quite a few out there despite the
That CLK feels like a jeep when driving fast on a turn.
I hate my CLK for that.
I have a 350z Nissan that is half the price and drives 50% better than that
Unless it was a financial situation to swap I wouldn't bother.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.