And had been mooted months and months ago.
This means if I want to buy something the Swedes designed, it now has to have Ford components.
And had been mooted months and months ago.
This means if I want to buy something the Swedes designed, it now has to have Ford components.
They'd certainly like it to be - but usually fails. The X type Jag is a prime example.
Yes.
Most were deflector piston. Inlet port at back of cylinder, exhaust at front. To stop intake air exiting straight down exhaust the piston had big heavy offset lump to deflect the incoming charge upwards.
DKW perfected the modern Schnurle loop scavenge. Light, balanced, flat top piston, side transfer ports pointing rearwards and upwards.
The DWK RT125 was taken in war reparations by BSA in UK, Harley Davidson in USA and also continued in production at IFA (later MZ) in original GDR factory. BSA mirror imaged the whole engine to put gear shift on correct side and made the BSA Bantam. Harley made the Hummer. Under USA Japanese aid plan the Hummer design was given to Yamaha.
Prime requirement that for a car - getting you to the ski slopes. Must be why it was such a success. Despite being one of the ugliest cars ever made, and a disgrace to the Jaguar name.
A BMW fan has no sound footing from which to call other cars "ugly".
That'll be why so many now copy the Bangle look. But regardless of that, they can't beat the X type in the ugly stakes.
Come on. Pre XJ40 Jags are in the main good looking. The XJ40 is alright by virtue of its low roofline. The X300 and X350 are good looking cars. The X, S and previous XJ are horrid. They're back on form with the new XJ and XF.
"Doki" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
With you so far.
A bit bland and dated, but basically OK.
Yup
? Previous XJ was the X350... (I'm with you on the S, and the X is just dull)
Ah. Now there I disagree. I don't much like the XF. Could be anything. Not seen the new XJ in the flesh, but I'm not expecting much.
Err yes, exactly (0) copy the Bangle look. However BMW continue to attract their core market of hair dressers and junior sales reps so it doesn't matter what their cars look like.
You didn't mention the XK which is still one of the best looking cars on the road. However I was commenting on BMWs which are vile, presumably Bangle's guide dog barked at the wrong moment as he was drawing them.
The X3/5/6 in particular are vomit inducing.
Difficult to say. The XF is a lot better than the S-type, but most of the improvement is in the interior. However since that's the bit I look at most often I suppose that's the bit that really matters.
The new XJ is looking a bit odd around the arse.
All the XF needs is a front end redesign. Jaguar usually do better with the warmed over versions - the XK and S-type both looked better after a mild redesign part way through their life. The XJ350 also improved but for some reason they made a dog's breakfast of the XJR.
All that says is you know nothing about hairdressers and junior sales reps. Neither could afford a new BMW. Or likely any new car.
As is every single vehicle in that class. They all look just plain stupid. Vehicles for posers only.
%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
Original XJ - yes, although it's starting to look a bit dated and bland. Current XJ - no. It's got a fat arse.
Got confused on my Jag models. The X350 is the ally XJ, and yes, it's horrible. Looks like an X300/308 in a hall of mirrors. Just doensn't work proportion wise.
I suggest you take a look at what the hairdressers go home in. MX5, BMW Z something, Audi TT. It used to be pink Suzuki Vitaras but nowadays they go for the BMW.
K
At least some hairdressers have taste.
"Doki" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
Mmm. I think it's bloody gorgeous, although the bling on the R is a little too factory-chavved.
%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
YJWIM.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.