Hi Shane.. Hon, the window should be covered under the same claim. If it were me, I would make a complete list of what was taken (count the CD's as a loss, your home owner's is expected to cover it, not your auto policy, and it isn't worth a homeowner's claim for some CD's) and a monitary value, provide documentation if possible, and receipts are even better. They will deduct the $250, and pay for the rest, meaning you will get your window, and lose some belongings, but may come out without having to spend a penny ... except of course to replace the things that were in the car.
If it were me, and I had the $180, I would have someone do it. The reason is they will not only be able to get all the glass out, they will be able to tell if anything else is damaged like the regulator or weatherstripping and they will gurantee their work so if it's fubar you won't have to mess with it.
Sorry your car got broken into, sounds suspicious to me too... next time, leave it at my house, and take the keys with ya!
Kate
| > The reason for my reply is.. why in the world would you opt for a $500 | > deductible on your Comp coverage? On Comp, nothing higher than $50 makes | it | > worth while. Say, a rock in the windshield, a parking lot ding, slashed | > tires, a broken window, shopping cart whams it, a kid keys it.. see where | I | > am going with this? Yup, your premimums would be a little higher, but if | you | > think of it as a payment plan on what will eventually happen anyway, it | > makes it all worthwhile. | >
| > *mom mode off* | >
| > Kate | >
| >
| >
| |