new mustang

It's not structurally bad styling. Lose the klingon ridges and a good light refresh would fix it.
What bothers me is what I noticed today... the rocker panels... the high panel seam behind the door... ugly. The fender makes a horizontal seam with the rocker. Again ugly. But it's wierd, under the rocker there's a black rocker panel trim piece. I have to see the car in person to figure out what's going on there... but really the seams just are badly arranged. Could be a safety oriented trade off.
Reply to
Brent
amazes me how ALL the mustangs '64 to '73 were beautiful .... do designers since then just have no taste ?...I mean my '92 fox vert is ugly......
Reply to
jim stewart
amazes me how ALL the mustangs '64 to '73 were beautiful .... do designers since then just have no taste ?...I mean my '92 fox vert is ugly......
Reply to
jim stewart
I'm going to keep my fingers crossed, hoping the folks who can do something about the perceived problems as voiced all across the InterWeb are paying attention and will act. All the physical examples we have seen so far were pretty much hand-made; plenty of time before production actually begins.
I also keep reminding myself that the designers and deciders weren't thinking of the Hooked-On-Mustang crowd: they need a much bigger group to become interested. In the meantime I'm not all that offended by a plump BMW with Ford technology and prices.
Reply to
Frank S

Site Timeline Threads

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.