Matt wrote: > Love the Fox body. > Newer ones look too much like ricers > (really ducking and running for cover but finding none)
I remember when someone called them "the Ford Celica" in 94. First let me say I love them, I wanted one the instant I saw first look pics in Motor trend (or car and driver). And now do own a 95.
I'll say what I said to that person long ago. The Mustang doesn't look like the celica (or any other ricer you can name). Just the opposite, the Celica (and a LOT of other Japanese cars) look like the Mustang. The Japanese were heavily influenced by Fords "pony" concept, sporty affordable cars, and took styling ques by the dozens. Even going so far as to try and make a baby mustang.
Take a look at a vintage Celica or Corolla, perhaps a lot of you haven't seen (or paid any attention to) some of these cars. A lot of them up to
1981 or so were only rarely imported.
Look at these pics:
90's celica which is indeed shaped pretty similar to the SN95's... Because of course Ford used "retro" styling ques in the redesign; That Toyota had long since incorporated from the same early 'stangs.
So next time you see one say to yourself: That looks like the Mustang that the Japanese have been ripping off for 20 years.
Matt > 89 5.0 GT vert (ok so I'm prejudiced)
I love the Fox body too, I'm planning on buying one. and a 65 fastback.