Thinking about purchasing a Maxima. Any advice?

I am in need of another car and am on a budget. I am looking for a reasonably good performing car, 4 doors, safety and reliability. Obviously, I can not have my cake and eat it too, but I have been told the Maxima (95-99 preferred) may be the way to go. Can anyone tell me their opinions on this car and if it is a troublesome car to deal with or if it is a pretty good car? How many miles do they go on average? Timing belt or chain? How do they do in hot weather? Any typical issues I need to know of? Any particular 'bad' year? Any type ofhelp is really appreciated. I am looking at spending about $3700 on a car. I know I won't be getting thebest, but it is what I have to spend.

Thanks,

Erik

Reply to
Erik
Loading thread data ...

Um, excellent car, if a bit small. Drives well, quiet, very fast, and gets respect on the highway.

Dunno - I've met a few peeps with > 300K on their Maxima cars, but those were earlier models.

Chain

Um, what do you mean by "hot"? I live where it regularly gets > 90 over

2/3 the year. I have no issues.

Alternator - there is a recall. Other than that, not much. I've had a few intermittent injector issues, but nothing serious. (Currently at ~80K miles.)

Not that I'm aware of...

HTH

Reply to
filesiteguy

I would check Consumer Reports for this, as they draw from a pretty large group. My personal experience with my '95 Max SE has been extremely good. So far it's been the most reliable car I've owned. I bought it in '98 with 60k miles. Now it has over 150k.

If you want better handling install a front strut-tower brace. Inexpensive, and easy to install. It's the only thing I've changed on my car, and it makes a nice improvement. Starting with an SE would be a good idea. I think only shocks (possibly springs instead--I forget), wheels and tires differ from the others, but it does handle better.

David

.
Reply to
David

Reply to
Rich Perna

Sounds good. I am getting ready to go shopping around. Sounds like everyone I have spoken to with a 95 to 99 Maxima is very happy. Funny youmentioned the 2000. Everyone I have spoken with tells me to stay away from the 2k model. I am not a big fan of first year production models, but I know Maxima has always been somewhat 'bullet proof' in their drivetrains. Thank you for the advice. I will let you all know when I got my Maxima SE.

Reply to
Erik

Avoid a manual transmission from 95 - 98, they have a factory problem - the differential bearing is overshimmed and around 60 - 120k, it will disintegrate and wreck the tranny. I had it happen on my original tranny, and then on a junkyard tranny, before I found

formatting link
and found out what the problem was. Depending on mileage (I've had mine go at 60k then 100k), you'll probably have to replace the O2 sensors, 3 of them. Other then that, I've had two '96 Maximas and they were both reliable.

-Nick

Reply to
Nick

Think again! If you're going to spend that much money buy a real car, an Accord or Camry!

Ex-Maxima victim.

Reply to
Father Guido

What makes you an ex-Maxima victim? What year did you own and what happened? Do tell. I am ready to purchase and want to know as much as I can.

Thanks, Erik

Reply to
Erik

?> Ex-Maxima victim. ? What didn't I repair. Actually I bought a '94 in '97 and it was great for 3 years, then everything started failing at 195,000 kilometers

head gasket wiper assy starter alternator (2x) transmission (2x) rear rotors due to caliper failure drivers seat track broke radio speaker amplifiers cut in and out wouldn't start when below freezing rust where there shouldn't be rust and a few more things I can't remember now car has 250,000 kilometers now and I can't even get $1500 for it, it's in my garage hoping for a sucker, err buyer in the spring

good luck, I think I had a lemon, but you never know

Reply to
Father Guido

Reply to
Erik

You're always going to find the odd person that had a bad experiece with any given car. I have a friend that had a Camry from hell, doesn't mean they are bad cars. The 4th generation Maxima (95-99) is an excellent used car. They are powerful, reliable, comfortable, and good on gas. That doesn't mean that you can buy one that someone thrashed for

100K without ever changing the oil and it won't give you any trouble. There's a reason that 3L DOHC engine won ward's best engine several years in a row. No other V6 of the time can hold a candle to it. 190HP, butter smooth, and 25MPG.

-jim

Erik wrote:

Reply to
JimV

I've had my 95 SE since, well, 95. I've only got 95,000 miles but a lot of it has been city. I've fixed the alternator (think theres a TSB on this), clutch and ECU (probably my own fault after tweaking with it). The brake pads were replaced earlier this year. It's a great car, don't let the few bad cars scare you away. I did a couple 5,000 mile trips at

85-90 mph for hours at a time, no problems, rock solid engine.

Mike

Reply to
Mike Frith

Reply to
Erik

Not much difference, maybe a couple trim changes. If you get an auto make sure it shifts well and change the trans fluid if it's >80K and you don't know if it's been done before.

Erik wrote:

Reply to
JimV

It isn't ALL of the manual transmissions in those years. have a 97 M/T at 129k and not a hint of a problem. At least, the problem is now diagnosed so you can have it done without much trouble.

I had the alternator go on mine, (failed just 2 weeks after the recall was announced - so it was replaced for free :o) ), knock sensor (easy fix, $100 part), starter.

Generally these cars are quite tough and run well. Go to

formatting link
and see the reviews on the car. I wrote a very lengthy review for the 1997 year that contains what I won't retype here. You can check out many, many reviews on that site.

Dave

Reply to
David Geesaman

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.