I just read the Citeron has a new car in development that will run on the diesel only if the battery fails. You can also plug it in and charge the battery at home to save gas. The last item of interest is that it really gets 70 mpg. Not the BS from the government. I would like to see a Prius achieve 60 mpg as advertised. I figured it out. You coast down hill,
Actually, the 69 mpg (actually 3.4 L/100km) is a rating also, but probably in an EU cycle. Real world figures always vary as energy requirements of the passengers vary. I can't tell if A/C is available - most European cars forgo A/C if they are trying for economy. But that makes them a tough sell in Phoenix!
Honda hybrids run on the ICE if the battery fails; that form of hybrid is usually called "parallel." The tradeoff is relatively poor economy in town, as the ICE has to turn in most parallel systems. There are ways around it, and maybe Citroen/Peugeot has gone that way.
The Citroen appears to be a "2+2" style; room for two adults and two children. That's just from the pictures; I didn't see specs yet. Dunno about the Peugeot sibling.
Anyway, good to see more hybrids entering the market. The momentum is valuable.
including the possible future:"PSA Peugeot Citroën says that while it could market its Hybride HDi vehicles as early as 2010, the introduction is dependent upon its ability to make the technology available at an affordable price.Today, the price gap between a Hybride HDi model and a comparable diesel HDi model is still too wide and would have to be halved to make diesel hybrid vehicles accessible to most consumers."
More interesting concept cars in the Japanese mode:
formatting link
and
formatting link
Those have been around a while, but they clearly demonstrate how hybrids can expand into the performance market.
If you can drive like the governmental tests, then you too can achieve the "advertised" fuel economy ratings. Problem is, most of the governmental tests (such as the US EPA's) are outdated and don't accurately reflect the average driver's results. (Manufacturers are required by law to post the governmental test figures, in at least the US and UK...) However, since the same test cycle is performed on every car, then you can use the test results to compare one car against another...
60 (US) MPG isn't that difficult, if you try for it. Results on my US
2001 and 2004 Prius can be found at:
formatting link
There's always the hypermilers/marathon men, who took a stock US Prius and drove it 48 hours straight over a 15 mile course, logging 1397 miles and averaging 110 (US) MPG.
formatting link
A note of warning when quoting foreign car reports - be sure that you know what test cycle and what type of MPG you are reading about. US or Imperial MPG? and those different test cycles make a big difference...
You can get some pretty graphs of many of the different tests here:
formatting link
US 2005 EPA ratings are 60MPG city, 51MPG highway, 55MPG combined. For comparison units: City = 3.9l/100km or 72MPG Imperial or 25.5km/l Highway = 4.6l/100km or 61MPG Imperial or 21.7km/l Combined = 4.2l/100km or 66MPG Imperial or 23.4km/l
formatting link
Canada 2005 OEE ratings are 71MPG city, 67MPG highway, but that's Imperial gallons. The ratings are also listed as 4.0l/100km city and
4.2l/100km highway. For comparison units: City = 59MPG (American) or 25.1km/l Highway = 56MPG (American) or 23.7km/l
formatting link
UK 2005 VCA ratings are 56.5MPG urban (cold), 67.3MPG extra urban, and
65.7MPG combined, again Imperial gallons. For comparison units: urban (cold) = 47MPG (American), or 5.0l/100km urban (cold), or
20.0km/l extra urban = 56MPG (American), or 4.2l/100km, or 23.8km/l combined = 55MPG (American), or 4.3l/100km, or 23.3km/l
formatting link
982 Japan 2005 using the 10-15 cycle is (if my Japanese translation is right) 35.5km/l or 33.0km/l depending on option grade. That's
2.8l/100km or 83US MPG or 100 Imperial MPG, and 3.0l/100km or 77 US MPG or 93.2 Imperial MPG. I do note a OnMouseOver note that's something about 30.0km/l though...
Just a curiosity: When I was a kid, diesel was 1/3 the cost of regular gasoline. I heard at the time was because diesel didn't need to be processed as much as gasoline. Now, it is about a dollar more. What gives? Sticking it to the truckers?
Low $2-teens in this Phoenix suburb ($2.099 at Costco), which means that in some other suburbs and parts of Phoenix, it's below $2.10, and maybe below $2.00.
Diesel is about 10 to 20 cents higher than High Test around here.
Methinks you have issues with your Prius. While I've only gotten as high as 51mpg with mine in the past four months, I know a number of people who've gotten well over teh "government BS". At least I know why I don't get the advertised amount, and have proved it to myself.
Your last car probably didn't get the government BS numbers, either
Try hitting some of the Greenhybrid or CleanMPG websites to see how well people are doing with their hybrids. They get the government BS numbers; why can't you?
******************** When crude oil is "cracked" to create its useful constituents of gasoline, diesel, heating fuel, JP-4, etc., there is a "natural" ratio of each by-product that can be obtained, depending on the type of crude stock. So, if more gasoline is demanded by the market than its natural ratio will generate, then gasoline prices rise with respect to diesel. If there is a greater demand for diesel than for gas, then the price of diesel will increase and the price for gasoline will fall.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.