MPG experiments

hardware: -2002 Impreza 2.5TS, 90k miles -Yakima racks + 3 pairs of skis with poles mounted in the less aerodynamically efficient way possible -car loaded with 2 adults and 7 years old boy and all the gear for 9 days ski trip

route and time frame: -Chicago-Denver-Santa Fe-Springfield Missouri-Chicago (3400 miles) -December 25 2005 to January 1 2006

scenario #1: -Iowa -heavy rain -very strong front-side wind -car speed 75-85 mph -20 MPG

scenario #2: -Colorado -no wind, beautiful weather -car speed: 85-95 mph -22 MPG

scenario #3: -Santa Fe -frequent mountains trips -heavy acceleration on the mountains roads -relatively slow driving -23.5 MPG

scenario #4: -Texas -car speed: 80-85 mph -VERY strong tail wind -27MPG

scenario #5: -Missouri and Illinois -car speed: 65-70 mph -no wind -26.5 MPG

bottom line: -MPGwise: 70mpg and 80mph are totally different. Andy

Reply to
Andy Leszczynski
Loading thread data ...

Hi,

Think "wind resistance!" Notice the great mileage despite the speed w/ a strong tailwind vs what you had w/ a headwind! I don't remember the factor (resistance increases w/ square of velocity??? Someone knows...) but wind IS your biggest enemy for mileage--one of the reasons the US national speed limit was lowered to 55 mph after the early '70s gas crunch. Considering whatever might have passed for aerodynamics on most cars then, it made a pretty big difference for many.

Interesting numbers overall!

Rick

Reply to
Richard E Courtright

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.