I had used duralube a number of years ago and had found it does improve on the mileage. Recently I had acquired 2 old clunker - one 28 year old and the other 12 year old. I have considered using duralube again but had found that FTC had fined them for misrepresentation. I had read the FTC report about the misrepresentation such as reduced wear etc. The conclusion drawn in the ad was based on the pin test but FTC claimed that engine wear was due to many other factors and not only friction. But this still does not make the test of reduced friction invalid.
My brief search on the internet revealed many information on duralube and the new additive lubegard. It was claimed by some technical people that slick50 used micronised ptfe and this could clog up small valves while duralube used a chlorinated parrafin which could oxidised to acidic vapour that will contribute to the wear and tear of the engine. Lubegard apparently do not have these two problems.
My question - Is there any problems that is associated to lubegard ? Has duralube improved on their formulation ?
TIA.