2005 Toyota timing chain ?

Obviously this salesman isn't too knowledgeable about timing belts and chains. The Camry 4-cylinder does use a timing chain instead of a timing belt. However, the chain typically never needs to be replaced.

FYI, since you're also considering a Honda Accord, the 4-cylinder that is standard on the current Accord is also chain-driven. The V6 engines that are available on Camry and Accord are both belt-driven and need to be replaced (I assume at 90,000 miles for both).

All depends. While a chain has no scheduled replacement period per se, a good number of cars with chains need to have them replaced if they stretch. Chains are tougher on oil, and that has been a sticking point with Japanese manufacturers and the new GF-4 oil specs. Chains and belts have their relative strengths and weaknesses. Be sure to have your oil changed regularly.

Belts have their advantages in really long runs such as with overhead valves. They're lighter, quieter, and require no lubrication. Chains have the advnatage of overall longevity, but it's not as if they're better than belts in every respect.

Hank, it does have a chain, but no service interval.

LOL! Your salesman is confusing a chain with a belt.

A lot of Toyota chains have gone for well over 200,000 miles. The 2.4L

22R-E engine in the late 80's had a chain that would stretch and needed replacement at 160,000 miles or so.