OT: Picking on WebTVers

Jun 26, 2005 21 Replies

Yep, thats the way it is, or at least the way it is in theory, but with modern technology it is VERY, and i do mean *very* rare to have a propogation delay long enough to affect the posting order - ive only once in the last 2 years come across posts with replies to unknown questions/views. If you want to stick to old conventions assuming asynchronicity then thats fine, and as for servers that drop the previous posts - use a better one? Maybe thats because i've always been on a high quality ISP with its own newsservers. At work I'm posting from the dreaded google as my home ISP server cant be accessed from anything other than my home line, i have the odd problem here but its hardly something to get worried about - so i miss a post or one makes no sense due to me not seeing the first bit? Its hardly something to cry about, i go back to the real world and enjoy a coffee, do some work and get on with things that really matter.

j

Because the reader based in Wordstar defaulted to top posting. Since I HAVE been on Usenet as long as I pretend to have been, I very clearly remember that. And a lot of readers that appeared afterwards defaulted to top posting, too.

And yes, I remember replys often appearing before the original post. But, if the message was intact, then moving to the bottom of the article would often give you a clue.

And it was a LOT worse then than now. Sometimes the OP didn't show up for a day or more.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required