That's just the argument they use when they don't have one.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
That's just the argument they use when they don't have one.
go back to your shuffleboard.
You must mean erections don't you? They come every four years for ya, LOL.
Jeez, it sure took you long enough to answer for yourself the question you've been bugging me about. Yeah, two quick impeachments, and Nancy P will be sworn in ! And likely elected next year.
You will notice that certain other methods of 'regime change' which have been used since time immemorial I have judicously avoided stating. (I don't need any visits from th NSA, FBI and others, to ruin my day.)
>
Sorry,. I don't play that favorite game of yours, nor horseshoes. On second thought, the only exercise you get is jumping to conclusions. Be gone.
How about you taking your advice to him? Not that it would clear your mind, but it would keep you off the keyboard all day.
I did. He remains silent. You, however, decided to answer even though I never specifically asked YOU the question. That was why I repeated that my question remains. Got it?
Asked and answered. Thank you.
Not even close, sport. Impeachment doesn't equal removal. It's an accusation or indictment, not a conviction.
There's the rub, and the answer I expected from you. Thanks for not disappointing me.
I despised Bill Clinton, even the oxygen he still steals from our atmosphere.
That said, I have enough respect for our form of government that I would never have advocated a "regime change" methodology with which you obviously have no problem.
But that's just me.
And you would definitively know that how?
I prescribe it for you because you need it more than I.
Not to say I don't do what I prescribe.
Unfortunately, I no longer can do that kind of physical labor. I remember when I could. Dayam. Getting old is a pain, but the alternative is . . . Hillarycare
Charles of Schaumburg
I would not doubt that he has done that kind of work.
Conservatives work while you whiney liberals bitch....
Well, duh, thanks for the news. But in Bush's case, there's no way he wouldn't be convicted ...and hopefully that would be the last we'd hear from him in his shitkicker faux Texas accent.
Why the hatred of Clinton? Did he have an affair with your sister?
When did I say I had no problem with other methodologies? Check again and I didn't even clearly mention what these methodologies might be.
I too have respect for government, but simply no respect for most of the crooks and fools elected to operate it. (or perhaps I should say "game" it.)
yeah, that's just you. and you're stuck with yourself.
>
If that is true....why don't you coward libs impeach him?
Come on, cowards....impeach...
You're welcome. That fact appeared to have been foreign to you.
The let's do it. NOW. If it's a slam-dunk, have at it.
My sister actually voted for him, but ended up despising his obvious lack of character.
Of course not. There wasn't an implied anything.
Wow. Fired up a few more cells to get that one, I'll wager.
They can't impreach Bush. The ones that have any brains at all know there's not enough evidence.
But convicting Scooter Libby of a crime, when there was no underlying crime in the first place establishes a dangerous precident.
Charles of Schaumburg.
It must suck to be treasonous cowards like mack and joe.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.