What a WORTHLESS effort...

Ugly, hulking, it looks like a Toyota sedan.

formatting link

Reply to
RichA
Loading thread data ...

Woah! That one wouldn't look good enough to take home at closing time.

Reply to
SVTKate

Dodge's answer to the new GTO... too bad it will have the same fate. Butt ugly with poor sales and soon to be off the market... again!

RichA wrote:

Reply to
Hucklebuck

Looks good to me. I see lines from the early 70's B and E body cars in it. I like all but the tail lights. And I'd like to see them do something more diagonal on the head lights like the late 50's and early 60's Chryslers.

Reply to
WindsorFox[SS]

I said it before: why can't they just give us the Nascar body style:

formatting link
?

180 Out
Reply to
one80out

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:31:57 -0500, RichA wrote something wonderfully witty:

Looks more like a current generation Monte Carlo.

Reply to
ZombyWoof

The early 60's Chryslers were hideious. They just had good engines.

-Rich

Reply to
RichA

Except the ultimate sin. It has four doors. F------ family piece of CRAP. The new Monte Carlo with a

300hp V8 is actually not too bad at all.

-Rich

Reply to
RichA

Reply to
Rick Olive

Might as well take the Magnum wagon, at least it has some utility.

-Rich

Reply to
RichA

Yuck. That's just plain old ugly.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Okie Tom - TS #62

1998 GT Coupe 5-spd. 2001 Ranger XLT
formatting link
Reply to
bluestang98

RichA wrote in news:qvjv21dc6hiogeeil48csjkuv5pbbtbu35 @4ax.com:

The ultimate sin isn't 4 doors, it's FWD. The Monte is garbage.

As for the Charger, the cars in the top picture look like crap. The pix of the red one down below look much better. For some reason, DC cars look like crap in pictures. Both the 300 and the Magnum looked horrible in pix before I saw them on the road. Hopefully the Charger will be the same.

Joe Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

Reply to
Joe

Reply to
Michael Johnson, PE

It's probably just for cost savings. The nose is out of place for the rest of the car. It looks like the aftermath of a head on collision.

The style of the chunky 300 works, the '05 Mustang works. This doesn't.

-John

Reply to
Generic

I like it. Sort of reminds of the new 'Stang.

Dana

Reply to
Dana H. Myers

I hate it! And I'm a '60's and '70's muscle car nut!!!

Give us the '68-'71 look, it looked mean, this car just looks totally GAY!

Reply to
nospam

Reply to
Jimmy

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:18:41 -0500, "Jimmy" wrote something wonderfully witty:

Because if it is gay it can take it in the front & rear passenger areas.

Reply to
ZombyWoof

2 door cars almost went extinct, thanks to the laziness of the average person today. Too much effort to fold a front seat forward to get into a 2 door car, poor babies.

-Rich

Reply to
RichA

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.