hole in the bed

LOL

So what qualifies YOU to critique SnoMan's post?

An incomplete thought, then suddenly there's a period.

There was none.

It wasn't difficult. He did a lot better than you. Samstone corrected only three of your mistakes, but there were at least six in your little two-line reply.

Any of what? Are you okay?

Anybody with a fourth grade education has the tools needed to crtique his posts.

it was posted on a public ng you spaz. that pretty much qualifies anyone to critique anything they chose to. i'm not sure you gave that any thought at all before you posted that.

i understood what he wrote. periods are not a big deal here, maybe you need to go to another ng where periods are a big deal. i could suggest one.

you can understand what the snotart writes but you can't comprehend what he wrote? i think you are playing the devils advocate here.

well crap. so now you are going to come in and grade our correctness? i'm just warning you in advance, you are gonna be very busy little boys.

oh yes he is. and i have this idea that he's gonna be even better now that he has a new toy to play with.

And yet another Snotard butt kissing assclown, they are coming out of the wood work left and right anymore. My god!

Sock puppets abound.

Often enough, but not this time. There wasn't much wrong with the post. "Could some one please translate this for me?" was a foolish reply from someone with azwiley1's language skills.

Did you imagine reading that?

No more so than yours. Gotta tell ya, it is nice to know that we now have a new net nanny. Hopefully you have your nomex on.

well, berl, that was a really good come back. geez, you really put me in my place berl. wow.

Sorta like your sig.

My nomex? LOL!

We already have an overabundance of net nannies. You may not even recognize most of them, they're the "regulars" here.

Last one that I felt like poking in the eye was "Budd", the bible-thumping old whiner who's just so sick and tired of seeing posts about V-6s several times per year.

Yeah, *wow* alright. It wasn't a "come back", and you've already painted yourself into a corner after the "i'm just warning you in advance" bit.

Really? Care to explain?

Huh? V-6 post's?

He doesn't know what the hell he is talking about Roy, his head is too far up Snotard ass to hear, read, or write in a manner that every one else can understand. About the only thing that we could all understand and slightly agree on was we were all sick of the Bible thumping.

is this just budd, using an aka? i mean, two different people could not be that stupid or boring.

"Anybody with a fourth grade education has the tools needed to crtique his posts."

"Often enough, but not this time."

Now, that wasn't very flattering toward SnoMan, was it? Nope. But your only defense in this thread, so far, has been that anyone who challenged your ridiculously phony "Could some one please translate this for me?" reply must be a SnoMan supporter. Pretty empty, but that's apparently all you can muster. Since you have a problem with SnoMan's post, why don't you just state it honestly? Speak up. Go ahead, you can do it. If you don't, I'll state it for you.

Are you are talking to me? If so, you couldn't be more correct.

Now seeing as you quoted me how about answering my question's soIi know what your talking about.?

Sorry about the typo. New glasses.