I have a 2004 Explorer with automatic 4WD and selector buttons on the
dash for 4WD HI and 4WD LO; Also have a 97 Mazda B4000, 5-speed with
dash mounted selector switch -- 2WD, 4WD HI, 4WD LO.
Do I need to lubricate the front hubs as part of a normal service??
I do not run either of these vehicles off the road. Every six weeks
or so I do take each of them out onto a rough local road with loose
gravel and a steep up-grade, shift into 4WD HI and LO which I think
is supposed to keep the hubs lubricated. During hunting season the
Mazda takes a lot of trips on bad roads where I use 4WD HI and LO as
Yours is quite a different system... It uses FWD style CV joints at the
knuckles and the front diff - double offset at the knuckle and tripot at the
diff (the reason is the tripots can "plunge" while double offsets cannot).
Add that the intended use of the SuperDuty and your cars is very different
As long as the CV boots are inspected regularly for deterioration or
perforation, you should get many happy miles from your cars....
Thanks. I'll keep an eye on the CV boots. And -- I assume if I find
one ripped or about to rip I pull the CV joint, clean it, re-grease
it, and put on a new boot -- just like on my old swing-axle VW Beetles.
I don't really understand the sequence of events here. Where exactly was
this joint that failed? If you were driving with one hub locked in, or two,
forever, why would any universal joint fail? I don't see the connection.
Does anybody see it?
I have to assume that when you said crank case you really meant the transfer
case. It's not easy to break that piece except maybe through failure of the
frontmost u-joint. The joints inside the axle wouldn't explode anything if
they broke. At least I don't see how.
He pulled his pontoon boat out of where it was parked / docked
in 4x4 , then didn't take it out of 4x4 and flew down the highway.
the t-case exploded and took a cv joint too.
now he wants ford to pay
Just to make it clear, the CV joint that failed is on the front drive axle,
between two U-joints. There's supposed to be something like a little ball
inside the CV joint, which was gone (only a little piece left).
This resulted in severe vibration in the crank-case (attached to the front of
the transmission), which caused it to fly apart. This resulted in the automatic
transmission being destroyed. Apparently this all happened within a few
minutes, as about 20 miles earlier when I was driving the pickup there was no
vibration, nothing abnormal. My son was actually driving when everything fell
It was not in 4wd, as that causes REALLY bad binding when turning on dry
pavement, and both my son and I are totally aware of what that feels like. The
binding I've noticed all these years, when in 2wd, is very slight, and only when
cranked all the way left or right. With the Warn manual hubs, as well as when
the last set of auto hubs was brand new, there's absolutely no binding in a hard
turn. I don't really recall if it did that brand new, but I don't think it did.
Maybe mine experience is unusual. Certainly spewing pieces all over the highway
is. It still wouldn't hurt for anyone with auto hubs to make a couple of hard
turns in 2wd and make sure they're not binding. If they are, then it should be
Let me clarify something here, Rob. Think hard about this.
When modern-style 4 wheel drive vehicles first came out, they didn't have
locking hubs. Jeeps didn't have that in WWII. Pickup trucks didn't have it
in late 50's, the 60's and some of the 70's. Do you know what they had?
Just a solid connection. You were expected to drive the vehicle 100,000
miles, or whatever it took to wear it out, with the hubs locked in and the
front drivetrain rotating the whole way.
Do you know what this damaged? Nothing. Just like the rear drivetrain
rotating doesn't hurt anything. So whatever your situation was, the hubs
have nothing to do with it.
It is true that when a u-joint breaks, you can drop one end of a driveshaft
on the road. If you do that, the driveshaft's rotation will probably hit
something and that'll break all kinds of stuff. Wouldn't be unusual. With
the front driveshaft, you have the option of stabbing it into the road and
doing a bunch of damage that way.
So basically you claim the root cause is a universal joint failure. It's
still not clear where the joint is, but I'm going to guess you mean it was a
double universal joint and is part of the front driveshaft.
I think I agree with some other posters who suggested that you were in 4WD.
That makes a lot more sense than your explanation. I don't think the hubs
were at fault.
The problem with your explanation is that you made it up. After your
tranfer case broke open, you surveyed this pile of parts and then made up a
series of events to explain it. Right? You need to think about this. If
you know what failed first, you should certainly say so, but I so no reason
to assume that you actually know what the root failure is.
I didn't make anything up ... the transmission shop told me what happened. Now,
that's not to say they couldn't be wrong about it, but when I first called and
explained the vehicle and the failure, and asked what might have caused it, the
mechanic told me they've seen many similar failures, and the hubs have always
been stuck in locked position.
Anyway, I don't really care *what* caused it, I still don't think parts flying
all over a highway is an acceptable failure. Neither did the NTSB investigator
(who referred my to NHTSA, since NTSB doesn't deal with auto issues).
Y'all are free to believe I was in 4WD, but as I stated earlier, there's a
distinct difference between the binding in turns I felt when NOT in 4wd and the
binding when I had it in 4WD. Yes, I've occasionally forgot to take it out
after pulling my boat, but the first turn I make it's *very* obvious. I made
several leaving campground, as well as countless turns in the 100 miles before
my son took over driving. He didn't touch it, and it wasn't in 4WD after the
Could there have been another failure that caused it to go into 4WD by itself?
I suppose so, but my guess is that problem would still exist.
As far as I know, the vacuum is used to engage the hubs, the hubs are spring
loaded to unlock. In any case, by your description, you hubs have been
locked for a very long time. The failure mode is more often that the hubs do
not lock when asked, your experience is opposite that of most people with
problems in this area.
The result of your problem, exploding transfer case, is what I would expect
though. (Your transfer case exploded, by the way, not the crank case.)
Having said that, having the front hubs locked in 2WD would not harm the
transfer case, transmission, or crank case.Lots of 4WD systems don't even
have hub locks anymore, the front hubs are always locked and the 4WD system
is engaged and disengaged solely by the selection of the transfer case. If
the transfer case is not selected, the front tires merely turn the front
drive shaft, but the front drive shaft is not connected to anything inside
the t-case, therefore no damage is done. If your truck was being operated
unknowingly in 4WD on pavement, then the tcase would explode. But, having
the front hubs locked would not be an issue if the truck was really set to
2WD. (I've been operating my Jeep with the front hubs locked, and the tcase
set to 2WD, for going on ten years, and there is no damage or ill effect of
Your complaint that there has been noticable binding in turns (I assume
parking lot manuvers and the like) is a sign that your truck was in 4WD. The
front and rear tires on your truck will travel different lines when making a
turn in a parking lot (they travel different lines in any turn, but you will
feel this in a parking lot more than on the road), and the binding you feel
is the front tires scrubbing on the ground to release the stresses of the
The differentials accomodate the different arcs that the left and right
tires travel in any turn, but the transfer case has no capacity to
accomodate the different tracks of the front and rear tires. The result is
that the transfer case gets stressed severely when the truck makes a tight
turn on pavement. If the same turn was made on dirt or gravel, the front
tires would slip on the ground and release the stresses, and you would not
feel the binding that you felt on the pavement.
Your truck is equipped with Part Time 4WD, this means it is intended to be
used part time only, it should not ever be used where there is sufficient
traction (dry pavement) to hold the tires from slipping on the ground. You
ought not even drive you truck in 4WD in the rain, and unless snow and/or
ice is covering the roadway where you are driving, you should not use 4WD at
all when driving on the street.
It's possible I got that wrong. I thought the crank-case was bolted onto the
transmission, at the back end of the front axle, with the transfer case at the
front end of the axle (I'm an expert on a few things, but not autos :-). What
exploaded was what I thought was the crank-case (at the back of the front axle).
This is contrary to what the Ford mechanic told me. He said driving over 45mph
with hubs locked, either set to lock or due to failure, would cause stress on
the drive train, at least on my 2000 pickup. It's possible he's wrong, though.
Many replies I've read have said I must have been in 4wd, but I have no doubt it
was set to 2wd. I'm pretty near certain that part wasn't broke, as the binding
that occurs in 4wd is much more severe than what I'd noticed with hubs locked.
Not so. The crankcase is where the oil lives when the truck is parked, and
where it pools while the engine is running, waiting to get sucked up by the
oil pump to begin its journey through the motor once again. There is no
immediate relation between the crank case and the parts that exploded.
Both the front and rear axles are connected to the transfer case via the
respective drive shafts.
I have to think you've gotten some terms confused. The t-case can only
explode if it is engaged on the highway. Period. The front axle can be
locked while the tcase in in 2WD, and no damage will result.
You _think_ it was set there, and there is a chance that you set it there,
but in actuality, it was operating in 4WD when it blew. The front axle will
not blow a transfer case set to operate in 2HI. I do not know how confusing
the system may or may not be, my '95 Bronco had a similar system. You are
suggesting that you selected 2HI, and if so, the transfer case did not
respond to your selection. This does not change very much, you still have a
t-case spread across central Colorado, but it narrows the problem set a bit.
I am not prepared to engage in what you did right or wrong, but all that I
know about 4WD systems, front hubs being locked in and of themselves can not
cause the transfer case troubles you have reported. Your particular problem
set can only come about if the transfer case was physically set to 4WD while
on the highway, and this had to be the case for a very long time.
My Jeep ('81 CJ5) has Detroit lockers on both the front and rear axles. I
once (when I first bought it) pulled out of the dirt and onto the highway
without selecting 2HI. With the variance is tire diameters on all 4 corners,
as I approached 45ish MPH, my Jeep started to swerve all over the road. The
cause of this was that the front and rear and the left and right were all
going different speeds, and the traction on the roadway was fed back through
the tires to the steering wheel.
Your tcase did not explode because the front hubs were locked, it exploded
because it was operating in 4WD. If you intended it to be in 4WD, you made a
serious mistake. If you thought it was actually in 2WD, then your truck lied
to you for a very long time.
Me thinks that is a BS story full of holes. For one, even if you did not
back up properly to disengage the autophubs, the only result would be the
axles and front shaft would be turning and at the same speed as if they were
engaged and being driven.
I still think he had just pulled the pontoon boat out of the water and had
4wd engaged from the loading ramp. Maybe he flipped the switch on the dash
to 2wd, but the mechanical tension alone on the transfer case from the
automatic transmission could have kept it engaged.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.