And that encompasses what - about 90%? of all oil changes in North America.
And with short trips in cold weather a synthetic oil does not buy you much in extended oil life. SOME, yes. But not a lot. In high temperature (extreme heat) synthetic DOES buy you a fair return in extended oil life.
So what's call a s*it-fork a s*it-fork??
Now.... a lot is going to depend on what you call cold... -40 is a God-given fact for several days a year where I live... it's gonna happen, drop your purse and hold you jacket closed, pansy...
I run dino oil... I cannot justify the expense of synthetics and most of you guys can't tell the difference between cracked synthetics and PAO synthetics anyway.
Don't get me wrong.. run synthetic if you want... I put it in a customers engine every time they ask. But I'm going to have a real hard time recommending it to people that don't need it...
90% have extreme conditions?
in cold weather, synthetics will buy you extended engine life - they protect against start-up wear better.
if you change your oil every 3k miles...
cringe.
so it's still advantageous!
besides, most engine wear occurs during warm-up. if a synthetic can protect during this phase, and it can, then it's protecting the engine more than a conventional oil.
so, synthetics are better at higher temperatures too!
you use brake fluid in your engine???
yes there is.
More items you parrot as if your having said it makes it true.
More testimonial. Where is your unassailable data?
well, i didn't get it from any contribution you've made - that's for sure!
No - learn to read I said 90% +/- use conventional oil
Again - I was not talking about ENGINE life - I was talking about OIL LIFE.
There IS a difference.
Yes, but in the vast areas of North america where much below freezing and much over 80F are rare, there is VERY little advantage. - and just using a slightly heavier gerade oil for the warm temperatures does virtually the same thing.
Except synthetic oils also tend (note, I said TEND - not necessarilly always do) to drain down leaving less of a "static" oil film, they NEED to get there quicker.
In real life, under "normal" conditions, there is almost un-measurable difference in wear between standard dyno and normal synthetic lubs.
If you were as smart as you THINK you are you would know that diethylene glycol esther based synthetic oils are one of the major synthetic types.
sorry dude, you weren't clear.
i know there's a difference. engine life and oil life go hand in hand. and synthetics outperform conventional oils, cold or hot. end of story.
but it's still advantageous. you may not regard longer life, better fuel economy, lower wear as advantageous, but most people do.
sorry, that's incorrect. the adsorbed lubricant layer for a pao is more tenacious. that's one of the reasons it's a better lubricant.
wear product content of 2ppm vs 4ppm is small and "almost un-measurable", but it's 100% difference.
"esther" is a person's name. "ester" is a chemical compound group. but you're right, it's glycol ethers that are brake fluids, not esters.
ester lubricants otoh are multitudinous. "glycol ester" is a ridiculous trivialization.
As it approaches the limits of measurability, 100% difference may not be mathematically significant.
does that excuse work with taxes?
"End of story" is a good epitaph for this rather useless thread. This subject has been argued on this and other newsgroups for years.
You take the point that some are foolish because they dont subscribe to your ideas about lubricants, maintenance intervals, etc.
You havent proved any points. You just keep talking, saying the same old things, never with an iota of data.
It is boring.
Thread exited.
I have no horse in this race, but to answer your question about taxes - yes - you can round to the nearest dollar (in spite of the fact that you could carry everything to pennies). You picked a poor example to support your case.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required