I'm glad you too understand we are at war with the radical Islamic
terrorists on many fronts. Unfortunately many do not yet understand Iraq is
simply one of the eight or nine fronts because the Dims did a very good job
of convincing the uninformed that Iraq was not, for political reasons. Now
that they are back in power Iraq will mysteriously be part of the war. They
will not cut and run.
Sad news for our veterans:
Al-Qaida in Iraq claims it's winning war
AP - 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Al-Qaida in Iraq claimed in a new audio tape Friday to
be winning the war faster than expected in Iraq and said it had
mobilized 12,000 fighters who had "vowed to die for God's sake." The
U.S. military, meanwhile, reported that three U.S. soldiers and a Marine
were killed Thursday in Iraq, the U.S. military said, bringing the
number of Americans who have died in the country so far this month to
25. At least 105 U.S. forces died in October, the fourth highest monthly
toll of the war.
I never heard the Republicans being called the dims, but that seems to fit
Of course, if you are trying to call the democrats, "dims," you might just
wonder why the dims beat the Republicans so badly. I guess the American
people want there to be more veterans and fewer purple-heart recipients.
The loss of nearly 3,000 of our brave troops in our war with radical Islamic
terrorist in Iraq, Afghanistan and one of the other fronts in this war, is
indeed a tragedy. However to put that loss it prospective, that many died
on 9/11 just going to work. 8,620 Marines lost their lives in one week
during the battle of Iwo Jima. All of whom have died so you can say stupid
stuff in a NG
sorry about the strange way Mike replies. He doesn't understand in-line
posting. I guess when you are too old....
Anyway, there was never any reliable evidence that showed that Iraq was a
serious threat. There was, at best, only a weak link between Iraq and Al
Qaeda. Where are the weapons of mass destruction?
Iraq had nothing to do with Sept. 11, except in Bush's mind.
You are correct that the brave Marines died in Iwo Jima died so that you can
say stupid things in a newsgroup. And you demonstrate how to do that very
You forgot to say in my opinion. Where are the weapons of mass destruction?
That is a good question, yet to be answered. The WMDs, on the list submitted
by Iraq that they had as part of the ceasefire agreement that ended the
first gulf war as numerated by Iraq have never been fully account for by
Iraq or the UN inspectors, as to there whereabouts or if they were destroyed
or not, as required by the numerous UN resolutions One book by a former
Iraqi military man says many were shipped to Iran and Syria.
If you did some research you would know the President never said their was
a connection between Iraq and 9/11. It you did some research before you
post perhaps your posts would not make you appear so foolish so often ;)
"We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a
decade...We've learned that Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb-making
and poisons and deadly gases. And we know that after September the 11th,
Saddam Hussein's regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on
George W. Bush, four years ago:
No wonder you call the republicans "dims."
Now wonder you have problem with what your posts, you do not even understand
the things you post. There is nothing in that statement that indicates a
connection between 9/11 and Iraq, it simply states that Iraq has supported
terrorists. The President stated before Congress when it authorized the war
in Iraq, that we would find those that attacked us on 9/11 as well all those
that support or harbor terrorists. whoever and wherever they may be. ;)
Search the Congressional Record for Transcript of President Bush's Speech on
Sept. 20, 2001, WBMA
Jeff, for your information, Getting OLD ain't for Sissies, as you
will find out in life. There are many of us here who are OLD. As a
matter of fact, if it weren't for us old folks, there would never be
young whipper-snappers such as yourself, to make comments about the
You forgot to say in my opinion because the truth will show otherwise. The
previous administration also sought, and was granted, authority by the
Congress to do what ever was necessary to require Iraq to abide by the UN
resolutions and the first gulf war ceasefire agreement based on the same
inelegance, in late 1998 before President Bush took office. Search the
Congressional Record for the facts, WBMA ;)
I didn't forget anything. They made the plans, they ignored the warnings.
Straw Man so far.....
I presume you mean intelligence, otherwise I have no clue what you're
talking about. The intelligence to which I refer was the stark warning
given to the Bush administration that Condi *finally* read out loud in
senate hearings after endless prompting prompting by senator Dorgan.
As for your Straw Man, the only person with any credibility with regard
to Iraq resolutions is just another guy that was ignored because he
didn't fit into the plans already in place. That would be Scott Ritter.
Speaking of "searching records for facts" turns out that under the
freedom of information act we find out how really stupid and determined
Bush and Rumsfeld really were. Everything that has happened in Iraq was
predicted in an in depth study and the information was ignored:
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.