Should Ford upsize the Ranger?

Jun 23, 2005 Last reply: 21 years ago 5 Replies

First reply

Rowbotth

I think what with how big vehicles are taking a kicking just now, Ford would be too smart to make the Ranger bigger and alienate even more consumers from their vehicles. If anything, they might make them smaller. H.

Read the full reply

With other makes going with the mid sized truck concept, I wonder if Ford will do the same with the Ranger. Personally, I like a compact truck. Every weekend I'm hauling something and I'm getting 26 - 28 mpg. Of course, those who need to pull large trailers need a bigger truck. One thing I never undertood much is those crew cab trucks with the short bed, like the Chevy Avalanche. I never see people hauling stuff in those things. John



I think what with how big vehicles are taking a kicking just now, Ford would be too smart to make the Ranger bigger and alienate even more consumers from their vehicles. If anything, they might make them smaller.

H.

I can't see them going any smaller. Room in the standard cab is at a premium now and going any shorter than a 6 foot bed diminishes its usefulnes considerabley as a work truck. With the gate down, 8 foot lumber would hang out way too much. John

I do not think it would hurt it to grow just a little as a few more inches here and there in the cab would make it better for bigger/taller people looking for a small little truck.

On the crew cabs it is kinda a catch 22, they want more cab but do not want a truck as long as a ocean liner. A friend of mine just both a new truck with a 8 foot bed and a crew cab and it is LONG.

Went from Ranger to F-150 FX4. I would never go back. The mileage isn't as good, but much more power, comfort, and room. The best my Ranger could get with the 3.0 V-6 in town was about 17 MPG. Ron

snipped-for-privacy@att.net (JohnR66) wrote in <nMnue.348908$cg1.416@bgtnsc04

-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>:

IMHO, the only upsizing the Ranger needs is in the bed depth. Otherwise, I think it's perfect for its segment. With "compact" pickups like the Dodge Dakota getting ridiculously large, the Ranger pretty much has the truly- compact pickup niche to itself.

I had a 1994 Ranger XLT 4x4 with extended cab, 4.0L V-6 and 5-speed manual. It hauled anyting I needed it to -- including a 5-1/2-foot grand piano -- and averaged 21 MPG. If my wife hadn't fallen in love with a red 2001 Sport Trac, I'd still have it!

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required