I got my brake pads and rotors renewed at a GM dealer, 20k miles ago.
I was at a different GM dealer getting other work done and they
commented that I had 3mm left on the pads and they were needing
changed. I told the serivce manager that they had been changed only
20k and thought they should have lasted longer. ( I ain't no boy
Anyway he said, no need to worry as GM pads come with a lifetime
replacement warranty but I would have to go back to the original GM
dealer who did the brake work. So I make the call to the original
dealer about the brakes and get informed that they only cover 12 months
or 12,000 miles.
My question is, does such a replacement warranty on GM pads exist or
was I being told a porky pie?
The car in question is a Malibu 2001. I thought I should have at least
have got 35k out a set of pads. What do GM make the pads out of,
I don't know anything about GM pads, because I don't use GM pads or rotors
on my cars. I find it difficult to believe a dealer would off lifetime free
replacement on wear part though. 20,000 is pretty low for brakes, but the
Malibu used to have a problem with the pads fitting too tightly in the
caliper and causing hangs. This would prematurely wear the pads out. The
problem is the caliper not the pad, and switching to aftermarket pads was
not the solution. The solution was to grind just a bit off of the ear that
fits up into the caliper so that the pad was not binding up. Greatly
extended the life of the pads. I know this was a problem with the 98
Malibu, but I don't know if the same problem persists with the later models.
GM breaks on my 2001 Buick are good and bad.
I changed the front breaks at 30000 miles when
I installed new drilled and slotted roters.The OEM rotors
warped at about 20000 miles. The rear breaks now have 88000
miles on them and will need to be changed before a 100000 miles.
The after market rotors and pads now have 58000 miles and may
last another 20000 miles or more, so on this GM car the OEM
front breaks were crap and the rear breaks are great.
Is that, perhaps, because the rear brakes normally carry little of
the braking load? I think I have heard the figure of 20% or thereabout
On an 89 Regal I used to own, the rear discs were really bad about not
adjusting (because nobody would use the parking brake as is necessary
in that model), and the extra braking load had to be absorbed by the
front brakes. It caused extra wear, warping, and poor stopping.
I go through a set of pads in 25,000-30,000kms, but I brake late and hard
all the time. I know someone that goes through a set every 15,000kms, but I
know that person is a two foot driver. Heck, I know someone who goes through
a set of pads every 5,000kms becuase the cars sits in the driveway 10 months
out of the years.
Check this out:
Mackie wrote : I go through a set of pads every 25,000 - 30,000 miles,
but I brake hard and late.........
I must of been driving behind YOU the other night because I was
following a guy that was braking hard & late, I gave him the horn at one
point and got the hell around him.
05 Park Avenue 34,255
91 Bonneville LE 306,010
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.