Real electrical cars

gosinn · 2011-12-26T16:48:05+00:00

2012 looks to be the year of the real electrical cars.Some big players are reluctantly entering the market.If they do not they will be left in the dust. a minumum they are coming with a plug in plug-in-hybrid like the Volt butbetter, lighter and less costly so it will be interesting to see what GM isgoing to do.Will they come forward with a real car or be left in the dust?

Dec 26, 2011 23 Replies

Rate this thread:

Canuck57 14 years ago

Yep, only the American bully is allowed nukes and the ability to invade other countries sovereign space without notice. Facts are America is looking for war to stave off total economic collapse.

As you can't tell me a DC politician gives a damn about Iran people. Tell that to the dead Libya families and kids.

Nope, it is about power, politics and debt. All greed and power driven. You are naive to think American motivations are truly honorable. Hell, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan and others are still a flipping mess.

USA spends more on military than the the other top 25 nations combined. As if with war against the world. Can't pay their bilsl with real money but they can kill and murder.

I am no lover of Islam, in fact it is a tyrannical cult. But no reason for more killing and war. It is up to Iran's people to decide, not some ass hole in DC looking for a re-election platform.

Vote

gosinn 14 years ago

The USA has not attacked North Korea - reason there are nuces there

It is too late.

It is already here and has been for a few years.

When they bailed out GM AIG and a few other big banksters it was all just pretend and paid with money that had no backing.

Production and real values are basically gone and it is all a huge bubble and the air in it is already burst.

A hell of a lot of people are unemployed or poor and the superrich own all the worthless dollars.

How it will effect the USA and its behavior is pretty obvious - it is preparing for war on Iran.

It is a pretty scary scenario and completely meaningless.

Why send american soldiers to die because of corrupt banksters of big banks and corporations like GM.

Vote

Hoof Hearted 14 years ago

Not recently, no, and solely for the precise reason you state. But UN forces (read: USA) did in 1950, from South Korea, to the northern border of North Korea with China, to wit:

"A rapid UN counter-offensive drove the North Koreans past the 38th Parallel and almost to the Yalu River, and the People's Republic of China entered the war on the side of the North. The Chinese launched a counter- offensive that pushed the United Nations forces back across the 38th Parallel."

General MacArthur, as with General LeMay again some years later in Vietnam, supported and strongly advocated the use of nuclear force. Russia (a nuclear power themselves by then) warned against it during both conflicts. Their move, along with the rest of the world's outrage in the latter case, was the only thing that inhibited those actions.

Any non-boot-licking countrymen would be utter fools not to attempt the acquisition of nuclear weapons for their own protection, before the US inevitably attempts to attack them, as history has clearly demonstrated.

Vote