Now this is useful to know.
I never let it get to 15%, because I was concerned about the margin being bottomed out or thin. The mechanic at the dealership told that there IS a margin and that I do not have to IMMEDIATELY get to a mechanic when the oil hits 15%.
Your post above is further reassurance.
Thanks, I will it run down to 15% from now on so I get the benefit of the other maintenance icons lighting up.
Steve
An important point in this is that at 15% the MM might give codes to suggest a number of tasks in addition to changing the oil. However, there is only one reset procedure which resets everything as being done. Thus whether you are at 20% with no codes showing or 10% with transmission fluid change, replace rear differential fluid, change filters, etc. showing, if you change the oil (or even if you don't) and reset the MM, the computer 'thinks' ALL of its recommendations have been followed and does not remind you at the next 15% point. So at 60,000 miles the MM might recommend changing the oil and the transmission fluid, but if you only do the oil and reset the MM, you probably will not see a transmission fluid code again for another 60,000 miles.
If you ALWAYS change the oil at 20% and reset the MM, you will NEVER see a code for anything else. IMHO that is the significant point of what you were told - and a weakness of the MM design.
I think each recommendation should have to be individually reset - you could still fool it, but not be unintentionally mislead.
Honda had a well-documented issue with premature failures of automatic transmissions in vehicles with V6 engines in certain model years. They ultimately wound up extending the warranty for these vehicles, and in many cases covered the cost of a remanufactured transmission for owners so afflicted (they did this for me even though my car was not technically part of the warranty extension, and at any rate would have been slightly outside of the extended warranty period if it had been). They quit doing this some time ago, and the entire debacle has left a bad taste in the mouths of many former Honda loyalists who used to be able to rely upon superior engineering as an unquestioned quality of the Honda brand.
Lots more info if you Google (my search string only covers 99-02 model years, but the tranny problems persisted well beyond that):
why do/did you focus on "by mileage"?
No, it doesn't give you a mileage-based service schedule. It gives you a service schedule that follows the maintenance minder.
But it *does* tell you what "A1" means, right? It tells you exactly what services are to be performed when that shows up on the maintenance minder, right?
So my point stands: what you NEED to do is to START with your owner's manual, and do EXACTLY what it specifies. And it DOES specify exactly what services are required.
So what are those services?
The two Honda dealerships near where I work and live do not do this.
That is okay. The phone calls I have made as a result of this event showed me that the original Honda Dealership ( near where I work ) is not the cheapest or most competent.
The one near where I live made a good impression on me and their labor rate is only $3/hr more than the the independent mechanic across the street from where I work.
From now on I am taking my maintenance to either them or the Honda dealership near where I live.
Steve
The key is the dealership. I live in a small southern town in GA and am retired military. The local Honda dealer is excellent with top-notch mechanics. The dealership is privately owned and has been in business since the early 80s. When you take you Honda in for service -- i.e. the 30k service, they cover the factory recommendations, the cost and so forth... no padding.
Great idea. Seriously, write to Honda
Steve
Conclusion.
Steve
It's not a countdown to self-destruct, it's a countdown to call the dealer for an appointment, or make an appointment with your shade-tree and do it yourself.
J.
LOL
Conclusion.
Steve
I would also recommend you keep a summary account of service done and when. You may need this when they try to sell you service already done. I had a recent situation where the Honda mechanic stated on the recommended maintenance found in their inspection that my plugs were in poor condition -- after they had changed them only 5k miles ago.
On 5/8/2013 3:24 PM, tww1491 wrote: [snip]
Don't we all keep a record of some sort? If not just the receipt, at least "in our heads?" If the mechanic tried that with me, I would not bother with any records (what do I have to prove to him?) I'd just tell him...
"FAIL! Those plugs were changed out 5,000 miles back (perhaps by THIS shop) and you know they're good! I'm gone and going to be busy telling everyone I know that this shop is a rip-off and to avoid you like the plague." That's the only explanation that the rip off's understand.
On 5/8/2013 3:24 PM, tww1491 wrote: [snip]
Don't we all keep a record of some sort? If not just the receipt, at least "in our heads?" If the mechanic tried that with me, I would not bother with any records (what do I have to prove to him?) I'd just tell him...
"FAIL! Those plugs were changed out 5,000 miles back (perhaps by THIS shop) and you know they're good! I'm gone and going to be busy telling everyone I know that this shop is a rip-off and to avoid you like the plague." That's the only explanation that the rip off's understand.
The saving grace was the service advisor who knew what had been done and did not press the issue. On balance, I think I will take this to the service mgr, He needs to know this mechanic is sloppy.
That the mechanic told you, "...that my plugs were in poor condition" is NOT sloppy, it's dishonest. He lied to you. Either he didn't examine the plugs and just tried to sell you a, what?, $100+ upcharge you did not need, or he DID examine the plugs and decided to stick it to you regardless. Maybe I'm just old fashioned or maybe I'm anal about integrity, but in your case if that mechanic was still working for the dealership that tells me they condone such actions and are not worthy of my business.
but before you condemn mechanic #2, how can you be sure, based on the original post, that mechanic #1 actually did install new spark plugs?
That's a point but insignificant in the overall scheme of things.
If we can agree that the work was supposed to have been done at the same dealership, we now have a situation where either Mechanic #1 (likely in collusion with the service manager and/or parts manager) claimed to have done the service and charged for it or #2 blew smoke up the customer's ass and tried to sell him the same service 5,000 miles later.
Do you feel better that it was #1 who lied to you and cheated you? Or would you feel better that it #2 who tried to cheat you and the service manager backed you when he saw that the jig was up?
It's basic dishonesty any way you look at it. Perjury is a dishonest act. It's simply two differing stories, under oath, that are material to the issue at hand. It makes no difference WHICH version is true, only that the two stories (in perjury cases, made by the same person) are materially different. In this dealership it makes no difference which mechanic was lying, the problem is that ONE of them is lying and the dealership is responsible. That is the important point.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.