I have an 03 elantra that has 61,000 miles on it and I know the recommendation is to change the belts at 60,000. I haven't had the money to do it but since I've been unemployed. I have to go to New Jersey from CT for a job and wonder if I would be taking a big risk driving my car without the belt change. They charge around $350.00 to do it around here and it's just too much right now.
Thanks.
It's a risk, but not a big one. Do not leave it too long before getting it replaced. Age as well as mileage should be considered when replacing perishable items like belts and hoses.
I'd go with a fair amount of confidence. A belt can go at any time, but the
60k figure has some safety factor built into it. If you get the job, put some money away for the replacement though, eventually it will break.Thanks for the replies. I've already gotten the job, I have to travel for the training so once I get back on track financially, I will do it. I had planned to do it a while ago but losing a job changes most plans.
. FWIW I changed the timing belt at 100k (under warranty until then in California). I'm not suggesting that you do the same - just pointing out that the belt can last a lot longer then the 60k recommended interval.
The big question is - is the engine interference or non-interference?
---MIKE---
Are there non-interference engines that use timing belts?
Jon
Yes, some have two versions. The older Ford Probe V-6 in interference, the Mazda 6 version is non interference. Identical block, different internals. All the information you need is on the Gates belt web site
I went to the Gatesbelt web site and couldn't find any way to get the information.
---MIKE---
Yes, the Delta engine on the Elantra is a KABOOM! engine, mine hold it=20 with not problems until 6 years old.
Both of these have the info
Jon
Sorry, thought I was in the Subaru group. Jon
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required