All,
I'm looking for some advice on this. First, some history:
In December 2002, I bought and installed a remanufactured engine from PowerPro Performance (the company with the long warranty) out of Missouri. That engine had bad rings in #6 cylinder so it went back. I installed the second engine, and made a bad claim due to the Mopar MPI + Clifford valve combo (fixed thanks to Hesco) and sent it back. They shipped me a third engine before I had analyzed the problem properly.
I installed the third engine in March of 2003, but it's been using about 3-4 quarts of oil between changes since I installed it. The compression test passed (at least 160 on every cylinder) and mileage was acceptable (upper teens), although I got better with a carb. It also seemed to run OK. Not wanting to make another bad claim, I've been checking out everything else, but to no avail. Finally, I took it to the Jeep dealership to run a leakdown test: cylinder #4 has 33% leakdown (fail), and four others are at about 22% (marginal). So I sent the third engine back. It had been in my Jeep for about 15,000 miles.
PowerPro Performance's analysis of the problem was that my fuel mixture was so bad that the fuel washed away the cylinder walls. I talked to Hesco about this analysis, and they said that PowerPro's analysis didn't sound right. In order for this problem to occur, I'd be getting about two miles gallon, spewing black smoke, and choking on gas fumes. None of this was true. Also, my catalytic converter is only about two years old, so I don't think that could contribute to this problem.
Any opinion on either Hesco's or PowerPro's analysis? Preliminarily (I'm supposed to hear from PowerPro again tomorrow), PowerPro says they'll either ship back the bad engine (at my cost) or keep it as a core. Neither option sounds good to me. Anyone else think of any other options?
Thanks.