For those who don't know, start paying attention to the news. There is a big bombshell waiting to go off. There is a big question in regards to the Weap. of Mass. Guess what? The US has their info because we had a hand in it. We gave Iraq the Tech. Years ago when Iraq and Iran had their war dispute a very secret US company "Bechtel" was making their ground. Halliburton is the same deal. Do you ever wonder why there was no bidding on why the fuel for the military vehicles was in no question? All of a sudden "Halliburton" is under pressure for over charging for fuel. This is a link to a book that I read in College. It will open your mind!
OT: Halliburton & Bechtel
Along with Pasteur Institute, the US supplied Iraq with Anthrax as part of a veterinary program. No more, no less.
L.W All of a
Hell, I'm not defending anybody or anything and this is OT! BUT, Look up LOGCAP while you're at it. LOGCAP is the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program created by the United States Army. It is a program that uses a competitive bidding process to award a contract to a corporation to be on call to provide whatever services the Army might need ... right then. Some brilliant thinkers in the Army came to the conclusion that it might not be such a swell idea to screw around with competitive bidding processes for logistics and other services during wartime. Halliburton won the competitive bidding process for LOGCAP in 1992. They then lost that bidding process five years later in 1997. In spite of the fact that Halliburton no longer held the LOGCAP contract, Bill Clinton went ahead and awarded a no-bid contract to Halliburton to do some work in the Balkans supporting U.S. peacekeeping actions. Odd, isn't it. The same people who are screaming about Halliburton right now had absolutely nothing .. nada .. nunca .. not one thing to say about Halliburton when it was the Clinton Administration that was handing out contracts .. with no bidding, by the way.
They may have overcharged the military though in the fuel they provided but when they were aquiring that fuel, they had to buy it at the height of the action in Iraq. From what I read, it looked worse than it was because fuel prices dropped and seemed that they overcharged the military. To me it seems they did what the gas stations do here in the U.S. The price at the pump is not what that gas cost them but what the "refill" gas will cost them when they have to get more. Besides this is all OT.
I have a TV if I am interested in any news of you foolish americans.
This is 'NOT' the place to start pushing your political bull s*it.
In case you haven't been informed, this NG actually does have a Charter and US or any other politics aren't included.
The Charter can be found here!
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT'sPaul Brogren wrote:
Political bull s*it snipped.
Elflan did pass the time by typing:
Unless they are shipping fuel for refilling jeeps. :)
Where were you when I..and a few others..were bitching like crazy to stop the thread on Global Warming!?!?! Or do only conservative view points get blocked ;-)
Allen
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+wi llys
Hey, any excuse to go off-roading in a desert is a good one. Now if it wasn't for those A-holes with RPGs,,
Here's the rest of the exerpt from Boortz.com
HALLIBURTON .. THE REAL STORY
I am so completely sick and tired of hearing these Bush-hating, left-wing, Saddam-appeasing neo-socialists rant and rave about Halliburton that I could ..... well ... I could just spit. What morons. These are people who hate capitalism, hate the profit motive, and believe that every evil visited on the world is done so in the name of corporate greed. Losers all.
To listen to these irrational cretins you would think that this entire war in Iraq was being fought for one purpose, to enrich Halliburton. It would be not at all surprising if some of these anti-capitalist geeks believed that Bush arranged for those airplanes to fly into the World Trade Towers for that one purpose .. enriching Halliburton.
Try this experiment. The next time you hear some liberal parrot squawk about Halliburton just ask them one simple question. "Well, pal --- since you're such an expert on Halliburton, why don't you tell me just what it is that Halliburton does? Name one product or one service that Halliburton provides."
Don't hold your breath waiting for cogent answer.
Part of the perceived evil that is Halliburton is the fact that Dick Cheney once ran the company. As everyone knows, we should strive mightily to avoid ever placing anyone with the know-how and ability to run a multi-million dollar corporation in a position of responsibility in the political realm. Actually making a success of yourself in the private sector disqualifies you for public service, while not having any actual discernable private sector job skills is the supreme qualification for public service.
So ... let's get to the bottom of this. Did Bush or Cheney do something underhanded or illegal in handing some rather lucrative contracts to Halliburton for infrastructure and other work in Iraq?
We'll start with another question you can ask your bedwetting leftist friends. Ask them if they've ever heard of LOGCAP. They will tell you that they don't know what that is. You won't be at all surprised. LOGCAP is the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program created by the United States Army. It is a program that uses a competitive bidding process to award a contract to a corporation to be on call to provide whatever services the Army might need ... right then. Some brilliant thinkers in the Army came to the conclusion that it might not be such a swell idea to screw around with competitive bidding processes for logistics and other services during wartime. Imagine that.
Halliburton won the competitive bidding process for LOGCAP in 1992. They then lost that bidding process five years later in 1997. In spite of the fact that Halliburton no longer held the LOGCAP contract, Bill Clinton went ahead and awarded a no-bid contract to Halliburton to do some work in the Balkans supporting U.S. peacekeeping actions. Odd, isn't it. The same people who are screaming about Halliburton right now had absolutely nothing .. nada .. nunca .. not one thing to say about Halliburton when it was the Clinton Administration that was handing out contracts .. with no bidding, by the way. You might also be interested in knowing that Al Gore was quite a fan of Halliburton. Gore's reinventing government panel had some very complimentary things to say about Halliburton and the services it provides to the U.S. government. Ahhh ... but what does Al Gore know, right?
That brings us to 2001. It's time for bidding on the LOGCAP contract again. Halliburton is right in there, and wins the bid. This means that at the time of the Iraq War Halliburton had the bid for providing logistical and other services to the U.S. government. They were the go-to company. So, along comes the U.S. Army with a fat contract for Halliburton to put out oil-well fires in Iraq and all hell breaks loose. To the left this is all the proof you needed to show that this whole war was about oil and enriching Bush pals.
Recap: Clinton awards no-bid contract to Halliburton at a time when Halliburton did not hold the LOGCAP contract. Bush awards contract to Halliburton at a time when Halliburton DID hold the LOGCAP contract.
So ... one last question for your mindless leftist friends. Well .. make that two questions. Ask them if Clinton went into the Balkans to enrich Halliburton. They'll say no. Then ask them if Bush went to Iraq to enrich Halliburton. They'll say yes. At this point do all that you can to have your friend institutionalized .. for they are beyond all help.
Ya just gotta keep the political bull s*it going, eh?
It is off topic and against the Charter of this Newsgroup.
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys
It is also breaking your terms of service with your ISP. ISP's really frown on blatant abuse of a newsgroup, especially one with a Charter.
If you want to post BS, go find some other forum to do it please, it is not welcome here.
Mike
Elflan wrote:
>
I'd also be curious to hear if these lefty weasels can name one of Halliburton's direct competitors (i.e. who is competent to bid against them?). Try this: "Halliburton. There is only one!" (
LOL! Exactly! A big factor in choosing Khaki for my '04 TJ Sport!
No...you are a moron with a left wing agenda.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required