Lancaster Insurance

Aug 16, 2005 22 Replies

I got into a disagreement with my boss for testing a van (class 7 £35) as a campervan (class 4 £25) when it had no windows in the back I phone VOSA (formally VI) and the definition they gave was "it had to have cooking and washing facilities, storage and seats all of which must be securely fixed, a table and some sleeping arrangement these may be removable/convertible but there is no requirements for windows " I also phoned the MOT helpline who said more or less the same thing so it was a big two fingers up to the boss

Fairy nuf - I must have dream'd whilst high on cheap drugs :-)

so Austin Shackles was, like...

Sorry - didn't explain myself well. I was talking about the difference in insurance terms between a van and a non-van (which is where this thread started, ISTR - absence of windows making the vehicle no longer wanted by the insurers), which is where the deception with the windows comes in. I assume they have their own definitions of what constitutes a campervan, which probably varies between companies.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required