posting problem

sb bpehrf gv bpyhq rtg rile bpycfvgnqr. ragk gftnr bjyhq ro bg hcg gv av bg bzfer abrp arbprqq.

:-D

Lee D

... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. .-.. .. -.- . - .... .. ... - .... . -.

What a load of complete crap.

And you people complain about top/bottom posting. Bunch of dickheads....ALL of yer.

Ric Norris. Brisbane. Australia.

-.-- . .- .... / - .... .- - ... / - .... . / -... .- -... -.--

Lee D

I didnt realise there was a prob with either top or bottom posting until someone made a fuss about it. Would have been nice if they were polite tho.

I say old chap, would you care to place your worthless, off-topic replies below correctly edited, quoted text?

Ta very much, thanks for the time...

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:29:25 +0100, "Lee_D" enlightened us thusly:

silly sod. Mind, it happens, that's how we ended up with "hooter" as a synonym for "bugger". someone did ubggre, and someone else rotted it to hotter, and someone else else misread that as hooter.

Hooter is rather good though. handy for use in polite company, along with penc, and can readily be interpreted from context without being obviously rood.

e.g. "Some hooter has filled the back of me land rover with penc"

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:40:07 GMT, "Ric Norris" enlightened us thusly:

ferfexache, lighten up willya?

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:57:06 +0100, Mother enlightened us thusly:

see, he *can* do "polite".

you back off the cut, now, then?

Gracious me, perish the thought that any clueless f****it could possibly think otherwise (blush)...

Yeah, sadly... From the cut directly into the thrust you could say.

Charlotte has now agreed to a Vampire _or_ a Narrowboat.

Feckit, I think I need to reprogram her, just been offered a radbod!

For what its worth, my worthless, off topic replies were all started by someone else who got the arse about it all. I am as much pissed off as anyone about all this shit. This was a good newsgroup in the past. I have helped people with questions regarding their Land Rovers and like wise I have had help from people with problems with my Discovery and 90. Shame.

actually you brought it up in this thread.

You could always try getting over it....

I'm sure that i've seen a picture somewhere of a boat using a landrover roof as a cabin. What you need is a 101 with a knackered chassis and a tatty narrowboat with a sound hull.. :)

The first post you made in this thread was:

- >depends if you want to top post or bottom post. it seems if you top post

Which I believe, and I mention in a non-confrontational manner, directly contradicts your statement above.

I am therefore at a loss to understand why you thought it appropriate to drag it all up again - unless it was (originally) meant as a 'lighthearted jovial quip', in which case it has been misinterpreted, sadly.

Implying that it isn't now?

A couple of things spring to mind;

Firstly, you're in need of 'getting out more' if you take a little newsgroup like this seriously - life has more, much more to offer.

Secondly, contributions are ALL valid, some help intentionally, others hinder unintentionally, all are of equal value in the great bitbucket above.

Finally, you're now apparently posting correctly, and I doubt anyone will mind if you continue to do so.

You see, this is all a tiny piece of the interweb, tucked away from normality in the Western spiral arm of the Galaxy, nobody really cares, we all seek shares in an oil refinery, and we all make mishtakes. Nobody died, live with it, be happy.

On or around Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:58:41 +0100, Mother enlightened us thusly:

indeed.

including Richard Branson who said recently that he was going to build a virgin oil refinery, or something. perhaps we could all offer to buy shares in it provided he pledges to produce cheap fuel for our landies?

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:56:18 +0100, Mother scribbled the following nonsense:

result on both counts

reprogram her so that she agrees to *both*.....

Wot, all three 'both'?

I reckon I'll need to hide any sharp objects for a couple of years...