Well, got the BX yesterday, drove it around today, and, well, it's a funny little French car. Seems to do the trick, though I don't like the over-firmness (white knuckle ride quality) of the lowest suspension setting!
The seats are quite comfy, the ride quality is reasonable, the handling is, well, a bit wallowy, but I wasn't expecting anything great as I'd been in a BX before. Performance isn't brilliant, but again you wouldn't really expect that - it's not all that bad though.
Economy wise, I averaged 33mpg, which comprised 80mph on the motorway (at around 3500rpm) most of the way back picking it up yesterday (around 100 miles, of which 60 were on the motorway), a steady 70-75 in and out of London, some rush hour traffic and some journeys on 30/40mph roads, and a reasonable amount of queuing traffic in London (coming off the A40 from Paddington queuing to get onto Scrubs Lane to get towards Harlesden - going past the Great Trade Centre, amongst other queues).
Is that about right for a 1.6 litre petrol BX, or should I expect slightly better? I'm thinking it's probably about right as I guess 80mph won't be all that economical in a small engine like that, and the traffic won't have helped all that much. Anyone care to differ?
Also, does the 1.6 litre 8-valve engine in the BX have an interference design or a design that generally stays out of your way and minds its own business? I'm wondering this as it's almost certainly on its original cambelt (after 13 years - eek!!) and I'm getting a bit paranoid, and Citroen in their infinite wisdom made half of the panels out of plastic, but made the cambelt cover out of metal (!) so without getting the spanners out there's no easy way to just bend it back and have a look at the brittility (gotta be a candidate for next year's Oxford English, surely?) of the cambelt.
Peter