For fun. If you don't like sigs, dont read them.
I don't quote sigs. My newsreader works. Someone else must have done.
You screwed up, I ain't a top poster. I hate top posters.
For fun. If you don't like sigs, dont read them.
I don't quote sigs. My newsreader works. Someone else must have done.
You screwed up, I ain't a top poster. I hate top posters.
Peter Hucker wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:31:25 +0100:
Someone else did.. But you left it in there.
OK, you middle posted. You put your reply in the right place, and if you'd just deleted the rest of the crap (mainly your twice quoted sig), I'd never have complained in the first place :)
That's an ancient rule. You can't get much in 4 lines. My websites take 3!
It ain't an average.
30 sigs at the bottom! Got fed up in the end and added a "sig-quoted" filter to my killfile :-)Probably didn't notice it. My newsreader (and all of them I think) only remove unquoted sigs.
You're too pedantic. I frequently complain about lack of snipping, but only when it gets rediculous.
And no you won't be the first to say I made a spelling mistake.
Peter Hucker wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:30:50 +0100:
wrote: [snip]
Perhaps. Then again, 60 lines of sigs and 20+ lines of quoted text, all for a one word is perhaps verging on the ridiculous.
Indeed I won't. Since I don't beleive I've ever said you made a spelling mistake.
If it's the same Peter Hucker who continuously crossposts untrimmed trolls to irrelevant newsgroups it's par for the course.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required