Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am your Father. Prepare to die.
Star Wars meets Princess Bride?
Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am your Father. Prepare to die.
Star Wars meets Princess Bride?
Good question. I'm only speaking of what I know of US law. And I am not a lawyer.
But not to refer to a particular line of cars produced by a particular manufacturer. There's nothing new about using existing words as a trademark. No conflict results: the protection of trade names doesn't extend to all areas of life.
A lot depends on a lot of things, which I can't address precisely enough so I won't. But, for example, "McDonalds" has asserted, and won, protection for "Mc" in certain contexts, and Toys R Us has won cases against those who have used the "X R Us" theme, whether with a forwards or backwards R.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required