clio 182's

Jan 28, 2008 43 Replies

Garages and trade buyers know that the Alfa will be harder to sell than the Renault, so buying the Alfa is a bigger risk. This means they won't pay as much for a 147 GTA as they would for a Clio V6. They will, however, retail the Alfa for similar money while they still can, because the whole reason for being in the trade is to make as much money as possible. /Nobody/ in the trade will pay above bottom book for a 147 GTA - not even the Alfa Specialists. They will pay above bottom book for a Clio V6 though, because they're rarer, more sought after and therefore easier to sell.

Private Alfa sellers are notoriously unrealistic when it comes to car values. Alfas still have the reputation with Joe Public of being unreliable, troublesome and difficult - deserved or not - yet the people who own them still think they're worth big money.

Any car is only worth what someone will pay for it.

You left the smiley out.

Make your mind up - a paragraph or so back it was 'us'.

At least apply some consistency to your s**te.

Is this guy for real? Of course you do Steve, you just keep telling yourself that!

I do, mostly because it's true.

We're not all poor, you know ;-)

I place much more importance on other things than having a c*ck extension on my drive.

The 75 works on the track, I enjoy driving it, what more could I want?

Yes, I baulk at spending money, but I'm a northern tightwad who just can't see the point in spending several thousand pounds to have a tiny amount of extra fun.

Yes but it is in Wales...........

Why d'you think I moved here?

Katie isn't putting out so you came down for the sheep?

It seems that from my time doing the shopping over the past 9-12 months Clio prices have steadied and the 147 GTAs have still got cheaper. I haven't looked at 156s because I'm not old. I could probably sell the Clio privately, buy a nice GTA and still have a grand or two left over. And the Alfa would be newer heh. Although having done some research I fear this front driveshaft carnage problem that seems to be common...

F*ck me.

Not much gets past you, eh?

Not so much these days, but a few years ago there was a massive opportunity to pay off huge chunks of debt by moving from the Home Counties to South Wales.

The price gap has since narrowed significantly, and equivelent houses around here and in Milton Keynes are now within £10-£20k of each other, rather than the £60+k gap there was a few years back.

At the risk of drifting even further off topic, comparing house prices between South Wales and Milton Keynes really isn't doing your argument any favours, not exactly desirable locations are they?

don't be silly, GTA or V6 Clio the clio clearly wins, for a start it looks a lot better. and second the right wheels are powered by the engine which is also in the right place too.

Depends on what you want.

If you want a sportscar, the Clio would be your choice. But there are many other (better) sportscars for that kind of money.

If you need 4 seats and a half decent boot (as most people do), then you wouldn't be buying the Clio.

Accompanied by the sound of a chisel on slate Vamp, managed to produce the following words of wisdom

The Alfa has a nicer engine, but the Clio is definately more of a drivers car, and judging from Dan's example, the Clio appears to be very reliable.

I have a short in the rear light that makes the brake light flash with the indicator some times if that counts as unreliability? Wiggling the wire cures it hehe. It really needs a new little plug thing on the end, so I'm taking it to a man tmrw. I realise I could probably fix it - but I'm scared and I like getting bits of paper to put in my history folder. But that's the only fault and it is over 6 years old now.

I have the Vee because I can't afford a Zonda/F430/F40. I'm not ashamed :-)

The 156 is 9 this year and has yet to break down.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required