I believe there is a difference between driving a car that "attracts" girls, and one that just is plain girly, did I mention a Ka??:-)
I believe there is a difference between driving a car that "attracts" girls, and one that just is plain girly, did I mention a Ka??:-)
Yes, but the sort of ladies that are attracted to cars because they're fast / powerful / noisy, either like sitting in the back over the big rumbling exhaust, but don't know why, or are just too stupid to know any different.
"¤¤¤ Abo ¤¤¤" wrote;
The smart didn't do too good, whats the specs like on the BE roadster? Which engine?
Steve.
Better than a kick in the nuts:-)
Erm... well I can't argue that point, really.
Thats not quite what i meant. I meant Landrovers shouldnt be classed as girls only cars. Not many other production vehicles can do what they do!
I'll let you by on a rough tough series landie with rubber floor. But a parlour on wheels like the Range Rover - no. Wasn't up to getting the X3 out of the hole JC stuffed it into, they had to get a tractor.
-- Peter Hill Spamtrap reply domain as per NNTP-Posting-Host in header Can of worms - what every fisherman wants. Can of worms - what every PC owner gets!
Only coz the X3 was is a fat heavy pile of s**te. Personally i would have left it there. But the Range Rover is the best of the luxury 4x4s and its stunning with it. And a nice RR from the early 80s with the V8 is pretty cool too.
"Depresion" skrev i melding news: snipped-for-privacy@uni-berlin.de...
Why, Bilentusiastenes Bil-selvbyggerlag ("the car enthusiasts' self-built car society") of course. Norway, circa 1956.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.