Well certainly cant complain
the old ecotec Cavvy with 120k on the clock put in a respectable 149.9 bhp @5500 rpm and 148.9 ft lbs torque at 4500 rpm
i'll let Alistair tell you about his beemer breaking dasteks rollers :)
Well certainly cant complain
the old ecotec Cavvy with 120k on the clock put in a respectable 149.9 bhp @5500 rpm and 148.9 ft lbs torque at 4500 rpm
i'll let Alistair tell you about his beemer breaking dasteks rollers :)
What about the output at the road?
Hello,
That's 3 times more power than a Ford KA ! I should imagine the output on the road will be very similar, as in - fast enough.
'Tis true - I said Id shop him if he claimed 150bhp. :)
They couldn't cope with the...
...wheelbase.
The motor used to move the front wheel rollers fused with the gap just perfectly wrong - with the rears in place the fronts were perched half on the other set so it would have moved about too much under load. :(
Still, nice run out in the sun. :)
Acirca 131 @wheels
By my reckoning, 3 times 60 is 180, assuming the old engine. And 3 times 70 is 210, assuming the new engine. I should imagine you're as thick in real life as you come across in here.
LOL!
Cool. That's the important figure of course! :)
The rolling road claimed Kermit had 72 bhp and over 100 lbsft of torque. "Oh yeah?" I said, especially since Superchips claim 63 bhp and 81 lbsft, "what's the output at the road then?"
Great. That's a useful contribution to the thread.
I think you're mistaking my question as a dig or hankering. It wasn't. I was wanting to, erm, know the output at the road...?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.