"Jay Honeck" wrote
Cause it sounds cooler, kinda like a riceboy with his Nitto stickers, but he's really running Sears Tiger Paws. Sad to think you could probably scan your food at Safeway or change the channel on you TV with one of these things. :)
"Jay Honeck" wrote
Cause it sounds cooler, kinda like a riceboy with his Nitto stickers, but he's really running Sears Tiger Paws. Sad to think you could probably scan your food at Safeway or change the channel on you TV with one of these things. :)
Anyone stupid enough to think that you can react to the speed of light is stupid. I've seen several times where people try to outfox the radar, laser guns. It just doesn't work, unless you have a car in front of you to get caught 1st. All a radar detector will do if it comes on instantly is tell you that you've been nailed. The only good they do is if you pick up the signal BEFORE the officer targets YOUR car.
oh yeah.. how do they try to outfox it then ? tell me. I'm curious now.
The JAMMER reacts fast enough to respond to the light beam. You get tagged long enough to have the jammer respond.
btw, instant on is not enough proof for a cop to show you were speeding. He has to take a 2nd, normal, reading of your speed.
ok, so unless you live in Alaska there ARE other cars on the road. Most of the times the cops leave the radar on all the times anyways. My experience around here. They're too lazy to switch them off or use instant on. (requires more work)
Remove NO-SPAM from email address when replying
It's your word against the officers.......wanna bet who will win that argument in court?
Sometimes, MINE. As a matter of fact.. I went to court over a bullshit speeding ticket (cop lied) on June 9th & won.
-Mike
Congrats. It usually goes the other way...
Cool.......not often that it goes that way
Yeah I know... few cases before mine & every person lost.. and lost bad. But this officer was a RETARD... he said he clocked me going 62 in a 35... and when the Judge asked what speed he managed to lock me in at by hitting the trigger.. he said 37. Said he dropped the gun. Only thing that dropped was the judge's JAW. Immediately dropped the citation & court costs & let me go. I hardly said a thing. I don't know what happened to the officer... he is a DICK though. When he pulled me over he said that I should thank my lucky stars that he was in a generous mood and wasn't taking me to jail for reckless driving... it was horseshit from teh start. But yes.. I agree.. it normally DOES go the other way lol..
-Mike
Yeah I know LOL.. see other post in response to Ralph.
-Mike
So...heh, heh...how fast were you *really* going??
;-)
Good Question. When you find an answer, lemme know, K? :-D
Rein wrote: ?
I know that, I was making a point aka: the "Phazarr", but in actuality you probably could be prosecuted for interfering in the operation of a policemans duty of ticketing dangerous speeders if they could prove you did and they really wanted to push the issue.
Is there an echo in here??
No it tells me that someone in front of me has been checked and I slow down. You really are new to this driving on the highway thing huh? :-p
Oh they were definately using instant on this past Saturday!
I was really going 5 over.. but I saw the officer & let off the gas w/ no brake.. got down to 37 apparently.
-Mike
It is L.A.S.E.R., at an infrared wavelingth. (IIRC 950 nm)
I believe the charge would be "obstruction of justice".
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required