Turbo buggy with a Ford engine and a VW beam front end

Nov 05, 2026 Last reply: 22 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Most street builds tuck the drivetrain away behind bodywork, but this one does the opposite: an open-wheel tube chassis with the turbo engine sitting exposed at the rear and nothing hiding the mechanicals. Compared with the usual kit car route, going with a beam front end straight from the old VW playbook feels refreshingly old school, and it clearly works for a rail this light.



The powertrain pairing is what grabs me. A 2.3L turbo out of an 88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe bolted to a VW Bus transaxle is a neat mix of boost and simple gearing. The front suspension follows the original beam design with a spring pack inside the beam, and the shock mounts are single shear, only there to slow the travel of the arms while the springs carry the load. Fifty pounds of leadshot hangs off the nose because the front end is very light. Up top, an intercooler sits high in the rear cage, coilover springs show at the back, and the console carries an analog gauge, an emergency-stop button, toggles and a lever.



The details that stand out are the repro Type 2 CV joints and the deep-dish black wheels wearing wide, low-profile rubber. One CV let go during a filmed drive, the second this summer, and the maker points to torque, sticky tires and possibly over articulation. The fix is apparently easy, with three spares on the shelf, and a step up to 930 joints is on the table. Whether over articulation played a part is still unresolved, and the microphone placement is still being experimented with, which shows up as pops and wind noise in the audio.



Project by di11ard. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The leadshot up front is the detail I keep coming back to. Fifty pounds hanging off the beam to balance a very light nose seems like a smart, honest fix, and it costs almost nothing. The tradeoff is you are carrying dead weight everywhere else, but for a street rail that seems a fair price to pay.

Which CV joints is the rail running at the moment, and is there any plan to move to something stronger after the second failure this summer? I am curious whether the repro Type 2 units are seen as a consumable or whether a heavier joint is the end goal.

The joints on it now are reproduction VW Bus Type 2 units. After the latest break the maker said a fix is fairly easy and keeps three spare CVs on the shelf, expecting this kind of failure now and then. A move up to Porsche 930 CV joints is being considered, though nothing says that change has happened yet.

Since the maker is still experimenting with microphone placement, I would suggest trying a spot further forward on the chassis, away from the rear of the rail where the wind noise and popping seem worst. The Olympus mic deserves a cleaner signal, and a better location would also give a proper record of the turbo sounds next time a CV lets go.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required