Likely buying a used saturn 2000 SL2

I am likely going to be buy a 2000/2001 or so saturn. I tend to drive gently but I do put a lot of miles on and drive cars into the 200k mile range.

Anything to consider in a Saturn SL series purchase? I'll likely do any work needed, including a overhaul of engine if the body is still good as we get to the 145K+ range. The car (2000 SL2) I am thinking about has 53k now but I am thinking a head.

Are rebuild costs significantly higher between the SL and the sl2's. I am getting an automatic since replacing a clutch even once wipes out the savings of a manual transmission.

Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide.

Wes

Reply to
clutch
Loading thread data ...

One known and common issue is a leaking intake manifold gasket on the DOHC "2" engine. In 2002 Saturn came out with a 2 piece gasket to replace the failing 1 piece original design. Other than that; fairly reliable.

Reply to
TC

There have been many posts about automatic transmission problems, leading to costly repairs, but cheap quick fixes which has worked for some, but I am unsure about year 2000.

Reply to
Kelly

I ended up with a 2001 sc1 instead. I'll likely miss the 24hp though the car outperforms my 2.9 Ranger 4x4 in pass performance both on the road and going by gas stations. :)

I ordered the service manuals from Saturn to guard against the future and to give me a fighting chance of fixing things myself.

I hope the saturn can match the 235K I got out of my Ranger. 175K would make it to the end of the payment book and be okay at the lower end. I'll be changing oil and dextron on schedule, it matters.

Wes

>
Reply to
clutch

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.