Doesn't this make you wonder about the CR surveys or reliability surveys in general? There are no unique "Buicks" these days. Everything Buick sells is just a slightly disquised version of something sold by one of the other GM divisions. I believe CR has gotten smarter in the last few years. I suspect they "adjust" the results of their surveys to disquise differences in responses when they know the vehicles are basically the same. In the not so distant past it was very common for different GM divisions to get radically different ratings for basicallay the same vehicle in the Consumer Reports survey results. The differences are not so noticeable now in the CR results. JD Powers is definitely not adjusting their ratings. In the JD Powers
2004 Vehicle Dependability Study, Buick got a 187 rating (lower is better). Only Lexus at 162 was better. Pontiac got a 297 rating. However, Pontiacs and Buicks are mostly built of the same parts, in the same factories, and by the same people. In many cases, they are even sold by the same people. Why should Buick's "dependability" be so high, and Pontiac's so low? Oldsmobile's rating was even worse than Pontiac's (314). But Chevrolet's was better (262). Just points out how bogus studies such as this are. And the JD Powers survey is actaully more scientific than the CR surveys. They at least randomly select participants. CR's surveys only reflect the opinions of their readers that choose to respond and these opinions are heavily influenced by the magazine's editiorial content.Ed