Marx and Lenin read and understood Marx and Lenin. By your reasoning, they were conservatives.
If you're a conservative who understands Marx and Lenin, explain the flaw in Marx's reasoning behind surplus value.
Because reading them gave you an orgasm, you wierdo.
You certainly think a lot of yourself to assume that you're the object of anybody's fantasies.
You've been Googling again, haven't you?
Rule#1 When neocon talking point is all you have, you use it.
Hmmmm.....
When you say "neocon" you are referring to the majority of the Dims. Apparently you do not understand the term you are using. Many Republicans have always considered themselves to be conservatives, not neo-conservatives. LOL
Really? Who was it said during his campaign: "I do not think it is wrong to spread the wealth around?
That so was such of a blunder the Dims went way overboard for weeks to get voters to forget BO said it, by attacking the guy who asked him the question to which he responded with that socialism gaff. LOL
Gary L. Burnore?
I dunno.
Interesting you should make that particular comment, however...
Don't be so disingenuous. Neo-cons are far right-wingers who not only supported the Iraq war but who still say it was a good idea and believe that Saddam really did have WMDs, never mind the facts uncovered by our own weapons inspectors.
The weapons inspectors were delayed and thwarted at every turn, allow Saddam to move the WMD's elsewhere His failure to obey the edicts of the UN is what lead to the Coalition invasion and occupation.
What part of that do you naive, blinkered LIEbrawls NOT understand?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.