Ghia rear end question...

Was the swing-axle ghia tranny/rear suspension/rear brakes the same as the bug? I'm not sure what year, but it's the wide-five lug pattern. Early sixties somewhere.

Thanks, Walt

Reply to
WJ
Loading thread data ...

Yes, they were the same (some few years had different gear ratios).

The only year that was "wide" and was also 5-lug was 1967 (US).

Here's how it came about: Ralph Nader blew the whistle on the Beetle's propensity to roll over.

Beginning in '67, VW quietly stretched the rear axles about 1" to give it a wider track. They also added an "equalizer bar" which wasn't a true camber compensator but did add additional springing near end of travel. The combo did a lot to reduce rollovers.

'68 continued both these "features", but the picture was clouded a bit by the introduction of the autostick that same year, which was based on the new IRS rear end. And the autosticks had 4-lug drums all around. So........to make the 4-spd cars consistent, all '68 4-spd cars had 4-lug drums too. And that meant producing special slightly different axles for the '68 swingaxles.

Speedy Jim

formatting link

Reply to
Speedy Jim

Thanks Jim. An interesting bit of history.

Reply to
WJ

Actually, the 67 Ghia has 4-lug wheels. But yes, long axles.

Max

Reply to
Max Welton

Good grief! Max is right (as always).

That means there were *no* Ghias which met OP's criteria of wide axle and 5-lug drums.

I bet the Ghia got 4-lug wheels in '67 because that was the year that discs were introduced up front and the 4-lug disc was already in production for the Type 3.

Jim

Reply to
Speedy Jim

Here that guys? Max is always right!

Wait till my wife hears about this!

Max

Reply to
Max Welton

Geez Jim, Look what you've gone and done!

I see swelling all the way to Texas

Remove "YOURPANTIES" to reply MUADIB®

formatting link
It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs. -- Oxford University Press, Edpress News

Reply to
MUADIB®

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.