I test drove a V50 AWD today and WOW! A touch small for my needs (cargo area) but what a ride! I thought it drove better than a Jag X-type (AWD) I also tested this weekend. Not as cushy over bumps, but better acceleration and handling.
I have tested a FWD version (I think the AWD version is available for the first time in UK about now). I found it ok but I thought the V70 feels like a better chassis & the extra room is invaluable if you use these vehicles as intended. I thought also compared to V70 the brakes were particularly 'wooden'. Overall there was too much 'Focus C-max' feel to the chassis, which is what it is based on. Have you tried the V70?
Yes, and I absolutely agree - the V70 is much more car - and much more $$. Comparably equipped, the XC70 runs about $15k more. It's worth it if you can afford it, but if you can't, the V50 AWD seems to be a good value. I am probably going to buy a used XC70 for the same amount as the V50.
In the UK V70's depreciate quite heavily. I chose between a new V50 and an 11 month old V70. The V70 was cheaper and much more car for the money. The list price of the V70 new would have been £28K - I paid £19K for an 11000 mile car.
Isn't the V50 AWD built more for speed than bad weather driving? The XC70 has raised suspension and without the right tyres a 4x4 car won't do much better in snow than a 2WD.
Yes, the V50 AWD is a performance wagon - possibly overpowered for winter driving. Torque and HP are no advantage on ice!!
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.