Not really. They are just tired of getting it in the ass and are making a
Probably out of fear of possible gas rationing in the near future.
LOL, you really need to start thinking long term Miles. While I agree that
they will save little to no money NOW, the demand will push for the further
development of the vehicles to where they both get getter mileage and cost
As it should be.
And it would have done nothing just like now. The problem is our wasteful
use of energy as well as our limited refining capability. We have had this
discussion before Miles and as usual, you only look at one side of the
problem. Fortunately more people are starting to look at the other side of
the problem where we can actually do something about it.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
To you perhaps. Maybe you have tons of extra cash around so you can
save the world. I don't. I can't afford a new car. The savings in gas
from it won't come close to paying for it.
Not so. I see both sides. Short term issues as well as long term
issues. You see only the long term and ignore whats happening now. We
are dependent on foreign oil NOW and have serious problems NOW. Long
term helps the future..great, now what about the short term? Ignore
those problems? You have stated before you see nothing wrong with
foreign dependency because in the long term when we get off oil entirely
in won't be an issue. You gonna deny that?
Oh come on Miles, we all know that you're the one in here with the big
bucks. I all seriousness though, what you are saying sounds more like a
justification for not wanting to make any sacrifices or changes in your
While ou may see them, you still only look to one side for answers. The
side that doesn't require you to make any changes.
Actually, I see both and what people are starting to do effects both the
long and short term. The sad thing is Miles, is that conservation is the
only real answer for both and the one you simply refuse to look at.
Drilling more wells alone does nothing but propagate the problem and will
make us ecen more dependent on foreign oil when we run out of ours and the
people are still the wasteful pigs that they currently are.
And with our current usage and rate of grown in usage, we always will be.
Even if all of alaska and everywhere else were to suddenly be opened up for
drilling. it would take years for anything to come of it. Sorry Miles, but
drilling is neither a short or long term solution to the problem.
Concervation can be started today with results happening TODAY. Sounds
pretty short term to me. And then if the demand for more fuel efficient
cars continues, the builders will have no choice but to work on improving
the technology, perhaps to the point of not really needing oil at all for
fuel. That sounds like a solid long term solution to me.
The only one ignoring them is you. Our dependence is caused in a big way by
our own hand and our continual waste of energy. Everything most Americans
that can afford it have is way bigger than they need and if they want to
continue this way, it comes at a cost. Just digging more well is truly
ignorong the problem and trying to deal with the symptoms. The problem with
doing that is the problem just gets worse.
No, what I said was that it is better to use THEIR oil first so when it
becomes critical, WE are the ones that are in control because we still have
some) and not the other way around like you would have it. Everyone is so
damn sure that there is another technology to jump in when we begin to run
out of oil and while I hate to burst your bubble, it simply doesn't exist
yet and possibly never will.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
What??? I should spend $20,000 on a new hybrid so I can save a few $100
a year and feel good about sacrificing? Good grief.
Nope. I look to solving both short and long term issues. You only look
at the long term and ignore whats going on today.
Ok, so you look at the short term, but you refuse to look at solutions
that can help. Conservation is a long term answer for our society. You
can sit there and say everyone should go out and buy a hybrid and the
short term problems will be gone. Face reality though TBone. You
refuse to look at a realistic solution that will help the short term
problems. A solution and not some pipedream that stands no chance.
Drilling more wells will get us off the foreign oil for the short term.
Using less oil and finding alternatives will help for the long term.
Great TBone. So lets hear your great solution to the short term issues
we face????? All you do is rant about how society wastes. Ya, we agree
there. So your solution is to get everyone to do better? Sorry TBone,
that means we will continue having a short term problem until long term
solutions are found.
Which is worse? Using our own oil, or using foreign oil for the short
term until long term solutions can be found?
So we better at least start finding where our oil is. But you liberals
wont even allow exploratory drilling.
On one hand you whine and complain about us being dependant on foreign oil
but on the other hand you are unwilling to do anything about it. Make up
your mind dude.
LOL, completely untrue. I am well aware of what is going on today and we
had this conversation over a year ago. At that time I was criticizing the
American car companies for having their heads up their asses as usual as
they were building bigger and bigger vehicles and investing nothing in
hybrids or fuel efficient vehicles. You OTOH, said they were doing the
right thing since there was no need or market for them and that the ones
building hybrids were wasting their time and money. Now look at what is
happening. Fuel prices are rapidly climbing and the American car companies
lost another 20% of the market share to those companies that were as you
said wasting their time. I was right then and I'm right now. The only way
to get out from under these problems in both the short term and long term is
conservation and looking ahead.
LOL, you said the same thing last year and look what is happening now. 6
month waits for those pipe dream hybrids and the American car companied in
big trouble because they doen't have anything. Conservation is a short
term solution as well. You just don't want to hear about anything that
could impact your lifestyle in any way. I never said that everyone should
dump their vehicle for a hybrid but they can take steps to save a little
fuel today and make their next purchase more based on what they need rather
than pumping up their lillte ego's.
LOL, what exactly is your definition of "short term"??? It takes years from
inception to completion get anything of use from a new well. We could start
conserving today and if we could save a gallon of fuel each per week (which
is not impossible to do) the impact would be massive within months, not
years like your ideas. Get with the program dude.
This is the part that you are not getting Miles, our public waste,
selfishness, and stupidity IS THE PROBLEM. What you are talking about are
the symptoms. And as we have seen in the past, if you mask the symptoms,
the existence of the actual problem will be denied and not be dealt with and
will simply grow worse. People becoming aware of the problem and doing what
they can to conserve what we have and stop outright wasting our resources
will both help to solve the problem and eliminate many of the symptoms. The
thing is Miles, you need the problem to show itself to motivate most people
to do something about it.
Using our own oil will be MUCH worse. There really is no benefit to doing
that. If you think that it will have any effect on lowering the price, you
are just fooling yourself. The price is set by demand, regardless of
availability and no oil company is going to produce more just to get less
for it. If we introduce more oil into the market, other producers will
simply cut back and all that will happen is that we will be wasting our
resources. As for the long term solution, that will only be found (if there
even is one) by the growing need for it and as long as oil seems plentiful,
people like you will simply say that it is not worth the money (like you
have already) to do anything about it.
LOL, that is because there is no such thing. You are either drilling for
oil or you're not. There is no middle ground.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
Oh geez. Your logic is pure absurdity. Ok, how about you send me
$20,000 so I can buy a hybrid. You'd benifit from the cleaner air.
What? You won't make that sacrifice? Too funny.
Development like you state is a long term goal. Not a short term one.
A year ago they were investing millions into more fuel efficient
vehicles. They have been under development for well over a year. Your
short term plan is to bitch about the consumer. Ya, real effective plan
for solving short term problems.
Where do you come up with this crap? I never said developing hybrids
was a waste of time and money. Good grief you're nuts.
Looking ahead is the long term solution. Conservation today sounds
great. Will bitching at the consumer solve short term problems? Hell
no. You have any other short term solution other than to say consumers
are wastefull and need to conserve? Some sort of real solution that is
effective? Thought not. Just bitch at consumers. Ya, thats gonna
change short term problems.
No, they aren't in trouble. The American car companies have invested
millions into development that far exceeds whats currently out from
foreign companies. You look at whats on the road rather than whats
being researched and developed. Besides, these hybrids are not a short
term solution. They aren't even a long term one. They're only part of
ongoing development into longer term solutions. Small tiny commuter
hybrids are not a workable long term solution. They just allow a
manufacture to learn and develope something better for the future.
Thats a long term solution. It will take decades to get more fuel
efficient cars on the road. So tell me again what is your short term
solution? Do tell. Bitch at consumers some more?
More bitching at the consumer as a short term solution? Bitching at
them isn't going to change much. Guess it makes you feel better but I'm
looking for a real workable solution. Something you won't do.
I don't disagree with that. Never have. But simply bitching about it
is not a solution.
I don't get? I have stated over and over that I agree with you on this.
But bitching about it won't change a thing for the short term. Your
whining about others is NOT a solution.
It's not just about prices. We are at the mercy of foreign governments.
This is a good thing to you?
WHAT???? It's a function of both supply and demand. Not just one. As
the price of oil goes up, supply has been increased. There are scores
of oil reserves untapped in foreign lands and oceans waiting for the day
when the price will support expansion.
That is complete bull. Oil companies have been asking to explore for
decades. In some areas they have been allowed and the oil found has not
been tapped. Oil companies constantly want sources for FUTURE revenue.
That means sitting on stocks and continualy finding new sources.
There is middle ground TBone. Learn about the industry before putting
your foot in your mouth.
Absurd, not at all, just against your way of thinking. Tell me Miles, what
mileage do your current vehicles get?
LOL, if they were working on them for over a year, where are they???? Funny
how the Japanese manufacturers have them NOW and are gaining market share.
Looks like typical conservative short sighted thinking to me. As for
bitching about the customer, I am doing no such thing. I am simply stating
the real problem whic you claim to agree with me on.
Sure you did, many times. Even now you are saying that buying on is a waste
of time because you will never recoup the total cost in savings on your fuel
What you said is nothing mre than short sighted idiotic thinking. You need
to look toward the future to make decisions today that effect both tomorrow
and into the long term future but like most conservatives, you can't see
past the end of your dick. IOW, if it doesn't bring you immediate
satisfaction, it isn't seen at all.
Why is it that any time someone mentions what the problem really is, you
call it bitching? Once again I hate to burst your bubble but bitching has
nothing to do with it. I am just stating the problem as what it is and the
only real way to fix it. You on the other hand just want to hide the
symptoms and pretend that the problem isn't there. The problem with that is
just like many times in life, if all you do is treat the symptoms and deny
the actual problem, the problem continues to grow until it is incurable.
In denial once again I see. Last time I looked, Ford was trading under
$10.00, not much for the #2 auto-maker and GM is begging with the union for
medical benefit concessions and just closed another plant and then you can
add the fact that GM has lost 20% of it's market share. Not exactly the
picture of health to me there Miles .
Because what is on the road and working is what counts. Like in the stock
market, until you sell it, you haven't made a dime.
Please explain exactly why they are not a short or long term solution and
BTW, they are neither tiny or just commuter hybrids anymore.
Yes, and a short term one as well.
Hahahahahaha, you really should think about what you are saying.
How is this bitching? In reality, it is just something that you simply
don't want to hear. Your soultion is really no solution at all. At best,
it will only make the problem worse by giving people a false sense of
security and more bullshit justifications not to spend the time and
resources to find a valid solution. Pretty much like you are doing now.
Yawn... There is a big difference between bitching about it and defining
it. What we need is for fuel to get to $4.00 or $5.00 a gallon and
rationing to 20 gallons a week to wake people up to the real problem and
with the continuing climb in oil prices and dropping in the reserves of
unleaded gas despite the currently high price, that is not too far away.
Yes, you don't get!!!!
You say it but you don't mean it. Why, because any mention of it and what
needs to be done is instantly translated by you into nothing more than
See what I mean. But you are right, talking about it does nothing with the
average selfish American. The only thing that works is rubbing their faces
in it and even then, it only works for a short period of time. The problem
is that this oil thing is not a short term thing and it is only going to get
worse and we have a choice. We can either voluntarily make some life style
choices where we are still in control over some of what happens or they are
going to be made for us and not in a good way.
Wake up Miles, we will always be at the mercy of foreign governments and you
can thank the "global economy" for that. Drilling more wells will have
absolutly no effect there.
Hahahaha, not when the supply can be controlled like it is now. And since
fuel is a requirement....
What does this even mean????
waiting for the day
Back in denial once again I see.
Get real Miles. There is a big difference between tapping and pumping.
There is no way to know if oil exists and if so, what type of oil it is
without drilling and tapping. While there are some fields that are not
being pumped or fully drilled, they have been drilled and tapped to some
level. The problem is that it is the setup for drilling as well as the
drilling itself and tapping that is so destructive and poses the potential
environmental damage to the area.
This is definitely a matter of PKB here Miles. There is no way to prove
these stocks exist and are usable without drilling and tapping and it is the
setup, drilling, and tapping that poses the real and possible damage to the
environment so there is in fact no real middle ground. Either you drill or
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
No, your logic is absurd. Society can not afford to go out buying new
cars that won't come close to saving enough to make it worthwhile. Make
a sacrifice to save the world? Sounds great, do most people have the
money to go out and buy a new hybrid? Current hybrids range in MPG HWY
from 37 (Honda Accord) to 51 (Toyota Prius). How long to pay for itself
to make it worthwhile to give up my truck that I drive 15,000/yr at 18mpg?
You don't look very hard to you? Ford has the Escape Hybrid out. Chevy
has hybrid versions of the Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups available to
commercial customers and expects consumer versions later this year. GM
has committed to spending over $1 billion to get hydrogen fuel-cell
vehicles ready for production. Spending money on developing fuel cell
vehicles makes far more sense than hybrids.
For cars that don't solve much of a problem. They are expensive to
build and cause pollution in forms not currently measured. Look what
goes into their construction. Hybrids have a short life because of
their batteries (which poses pollution concerns).
You state a real problem and yes, I agree. Ok, the consumer wastes.
But you have stated your problem as being the solution. Bitch at
consumers to conserve. Ya, thats gonna work.
I have not said hybrids or other efficient cars or developing other
energy sources is a waste. I never said its a waste of time. I said
its not economical to do so and not practical for society to do so as a
whole. Your solution is not a workable one. Society isnt going to
change based on your logic. It has to be affordable.
See TBone, here is a classic example of you only seeing one side.
Looking toward the future is great. We need to. But you assume I'm not
doing so and thats where you're flat out wrong. Trouble is, you need to
argue so you say I don't just because. I've repeatedly said developing
alternative fuels for the future is needed. But I also see problems
today that you refuse to address. Ya, tell the consumer to conserve.
Great realistic plan ya got there.
Because you try to state the problem as also being the solution. It is
not. It's the problem. Now tell me your solution? All you do is
bitch, whine and moan about the wastefull consumer. That is not a solution.
You have not offered any workable solution to the problem. Telling
people to conserve will do nothing. Therefore your solution is
ineffective and some other solution needs to be found.
But I thought you said the answer is looking to the future. American
companies are spending millions on technology such as fuel cells that
will easily surpass hybrids and is a far better way to spend research
$'s. None the less, contrary to what you seem to know, American
companies do have hybrids out.
True, the American companies have hybrid trucks and SUV's out. Ones you
seem to ignore. Japanese have tiny civic and the prius out.
How many years (decades) before fuel efficient cars and trucks dominate
Yep, but not the solution as you claim.
Yep, but thats your solution anyways. At least you admitted your
solution is not a workable one.
What do you think exploratory drilling is? Or in your mind it doesn't
exist? If it doesn't exist, why do you liberals fight exploratory
drilling? Oil companies want to find new sources for future revenues
just like any other business. It does not mean its to be pumped out
today. We need to find what we have today for future use.
Oh ya, the liberals not in my backyard routine. Depend on foreigners
How did they know there is oil in Alaska? If they setup that huge
infrastructure you refer to then why has there been debate about
drilling there? Heck, according to you its already been done.
Who said that everyone had to do that??? The point is that although the
sales of large SUV's have dropped by about 25%, there are still a hell of a
lot of them being bought by people that simply don't need them and all they
are doing is adding to the problem.
Back to that lame justification again. Who said that you had to buy a new
hybrid. There are plenty of used economy cars out there that you could buy
as a third car for a few thousand. My third car is a 240SX and it gets
about 10 MPG more than my truck and costs about $600 a year to insure. The
money it saves me more than pays for its insurance and I still have my truck
when I need it and an extra car if one of the other ones needs to be
repaired. To me, that's a win, win, win.
No they do not. they will not even start taking orders for it until the end
of May with production not to begin until this summer. And on top of all
that, you are buing a prototype untested vehicle. As usual, the American
car builders are late to the party.
There is a big difference between expects and delivers. Like I said, until
it happens, it means nothing.
And where is the infrastructure for the pure hydrogen that they need. The
answer is that it simply doesn't exist. Now you could use a hydrogen rich
fuel such as gas but then you need to pass it through a reformer to get the
hydrogen and that significantly increases the cost, complexity, and
pollution output of the vehicle. And on top of all of that good news, the
car will get no better mileage than a conventional vehicle if running on
gasoline and reformers are not always 100% efficient. If carbon oxides get
into the fuel cell, it will degrade the performance of the cell over time.
BTW, these cars also use the same batteries that the current hybrids use so
you will have the same problems there. Yea, this sounds MUCH better than
the current hybrids.
Once again, you are wrong. When driven properly, they are capable of
significant fuel savings and the fact that they are in demand encourages
manufacturers to perfect the technology, come up with newer and better
methods, and lower the cost. What you want to do will do nothing more than
eliminate any desire to develop newer technology.
measured. Look what
With modern battery technology, they are rated for 8 years and 100,000
miles. Not too bad for a fairly new technology. These batteries can also
No, but neither will increasing the supply of oil. In fact, increasing the
oil available will simply make the problem worse.
And it will remain that way as long as oil appears to be plentiful and
No, it simply has to be more affordable than not doing it and increasing the
output of oil will have the oppoosit effect.
You are not. All you want to do is increase the oil supply which is the
root ocause of our problem to begin with. At best it will eliminate the one
symptom that motivates people and companies to invest and develope new
technologies and at the same time deplete our reserves at an ever increasing
rate. Yea, that's the answer we need.
LOL. What is your answer and how will it help the short term problem?
Better than yours. You clainm to see the need to develop alternative fuels
and then want to do the one thing that will without doubt kill any
motivation to get it done. Yea, your plan is much better.
That is because it is.
I did. Let the price of fuel climb to level that motivates both people and
companies to search for better resources and methods or as you like to say,
make it economically feasible to do it.
And what would that be, hide the symptoms and let the problem fester and
grow like you want to do. Then what happens when we really start running
out? Conservation is the only answer and if people like you are too stupid
or selfish to do it voluntarily, let the market force them to do it
LOL, I said no such thing. I said that we need to look toward the future
while working on the problems of today. Your answer doesn't do that at all.
LOL, Yea, now they are starting to do it but they should have been doing it
5 years ago when the Japanese companies started. By the time they get their
shit together it will already be too late. Hell, it is too late now.
Which ones for the general public???? GM is commercial only and the Escape
doen't exist yet.
They are not out for the general public yet and are completely unproven.
Gee, how many did it take after the first gas crisis, six to seven years.
Much less than even one decade. Now how long do you think that it will take
to increase our oil output by around 50% and how much ecologic damage will
The solution is to either educate the public or force it on them
I never said that the solution was talking to anyone but nice spin though.
The solution is to stop such wasteful actions and there are ways to do just
A politically correct terminology for regular drilling. There is no
difference between them in reality. One just sounds better.
It is fought because it is a lie. Drilling is drilling and all of the
damage ands risks apply to either one because they are both the same damn
thing and done the same damn way. Well actually, there is one difference.
In exploratory drilling they don't know where it is and tend to cause much
more damage looking for it.
The destruction and risk comes from the drilling and preparation for
drilling, not the pumping. After they set up to start, they don't stop
until they find what they are looking for or they exhaust all possibilities
and the damage caused by this is what is being fought. If the oil companies
would take some responsibility for what they do and keep to what they
originally promise, there would be no real grounds to fight them but it has
been seen over and over again, they refuse to do it.
LOL, yep and they brought it on themselves with their refusal to take
responsibility for their screwups.
They don't know and that is where the fear comes from. If it turns out not
to be where they hope that it is, they are going to push to continue to
drill in other areas and once they start, it is damn near impossible to stop
them. The only safe thing to do is to prevent them from starting in the
first place and once again, they brought this on themselves as well.
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
So you want them to go buy a hybrid because YOU feel they don't need an
SUV. Name one of your great Japanese hybrids that you tout that can do
what an SUV can.
Oh please. A used 3rd car will not save me anywheres near enough when
you add up costs including cost of car, insurance etc. Where do I park
it? Most homes here don't allow parking a car on the street etc. Oh I
know, buy a bigger home with a 3 car garage to save the world.
Then you live in a very cheap neighborhood or your 240sx is worthless.
$600 will barely get liability only.
It doesn't save enough to pay for the car plus insurance. Not unless
its a clunker.
The Ford Escape will be the first hybrid SUV. Which Japanese company is
producing a hybrid SUV? Prototype? Same as any other new car including
the Japanese Hybrids. Compact hybrids serve little purpose. SUV and
truck hybrids make far more sense. They replace the very vehicles you
say are the problem.
The Silverado hybrids are being delivered. Besides, whats your point?
Your Japanese friends aren't producing hybrid trucks. They are behind
the American companies on SUV hybrids. Toyota hopes to have a
highlander hybrid out late this year.
Thats where the future is. Didn't you tell me we need to be looking
towards the future? Now you have a problem with an American company
that is spending over a billion $'s towards technology to do just that.
Are you trying to say Hybrids are the technology of the future here
today? Good grief are you naive.
Not enough to solve any problems. Their cost to the consumer, resources
used to build and short life span do not equate to saving the world.
How many 8 year old 100,000 mile hybrids are on the road? How many of
those GM electrics lasted 100,000 miles on their batteries which were of
the same technology. GM had those out long before any Japanese electric
Use of oil in general and foreign dependency on oil are two seperate issues.
No I don't. I want to use our own oil instead of Foreign. At the same
time I want to develop newer energy sources as well as making vehicles
more efficient. You only look at one side. I look at both even though
you choose to argue about it.
Ya, thats why US companies are spending millions on such future
development while the Japanese are building hybrids. Thought you said
future development is whats needed but you tout only these hybrids which
are not the technology of the future.
Oh too funny Tbone! So you think its just a guess that oil might be in
Alaska? Sorry TBone, they did whats called exploratory drilling years
ago in that area. True they don't know the full extent but they have
some knowledge. Thats what exploratory drilling provides. It does not
require a full blown infrastructure. If it did, then it would already
be in Alaska and the debate would be moot. Man, you squirmed on that
one TBone! lol
It's my understanding that the first fuel cell cars will probably get
their H2 from...gasoline!
Makes sense. The infrastructure is already there, so might as well make
use of it.
Still some serious problems with fuel cell technology for automotive
purposes though. The volume problem seems fairly serious. How do you
pack enough H2 in the car to get a reasonable distance? How do you
store the H2 safely? Where do you get the H2 from (it's energy intensive
But I think this technology is going to fly! Maybe 10 years? And not
just in cars. Instead of those AA batteries powering all your electronics,
you'll have a refillable miniature fuel cell that will do the job.
In the meantime, perhaps the prospect of $3/gal gasoline will get
America more serious about alternative energy. It's only been 30
years since the first "wake up call" gas crisis!
I think H2 is the next fuel for cars but I agree there are issues to
resolve before it becomes mainstream. Hybrids aren't a technology that
will last or have much effect. They aren't replacing gas guzzling SUV's
on the road.
Back to spinning what I said again, huh Miles. I said that many people that
don't actually need them are buying them for whatever reason. I am not
trying to define anothers needs but if you really believe that every one of
them out on the road was bought because the owner needed it, you are really
an idiot. As for capability, ith the possible exception of towing and
offroad, a minivan can outdue a SUV in just about everything, including
mileage. The problem is that they are not COOL like a SUV which is the
actualy reason most of them are bought.
Are you saying that your house is too small for a third car to fit or that
you can't park in your driveway? It sounds like more lame selfish excuses
to me. Like I said, you keep whining about or dependency on foreign oil but
are completely unwilling to do anything about it.
Actually I was wrong. It is actually $450 and yes, only liability. It is a
third car, what more does it need.
Clunker...no, older vehicle...YEP. And even still, it never breaks down and
gets much better mileage than my truck. And on top of that, I can take it
to the mall and shopping centers and not have to worry about it.
I thought that you said they already had it. You really need to get your
Well, as you mentionedm Toyota and Lexus.
But the Japanese hybrids are no longer "new" vehicles and have been on the
roads for years now. More than can be said for the American car companies
and their short sighted thinking.
LOL, are you serious!!!
Why??? Because they are cool, LOL. A minivan hybrid would serve
100000000000000000000 times the purpose of a hybrid SUV. An SUV is really a
completely useless vehicle but they sit high and look cool and would still
be for the most part non-existent if it wasn't for the American Auto
Manufacturers using them as an end run around the federal requirements for
mileage and safety and dolled them up like luxury cars.
And they still get shit for mileage. Just about any econo-box can kick
their ass for about half the cost.
Really, who do you know that has one, especially since they are only offered
in limited quantities in a few states. And besides that, it only gets 17 /
19 MPG. My truck gets close to that and you claim yours does better and at
around $30,000 for just about nothing, it is no wonder that they are not
Because ther is no point in doing that with current technology.
Are they really behind or do they just see no big market in them?
Just because they say they will do it doesn't mean that it will actually
happen. When cost cutting becomes critical, what do you think will be the
first thing to go? The fact is that fuel cell vehicles running on gas will
get no better mileage and will be incredibly complex. While I commend GM
for working with the technology and agree that it could be the future in
automotive technology, we need something that will be practical today as
well, not something that is still decades away. The Japanese companies
unlike the American companies are both looking ahead and utilizing
technology that is available today to help solve todays and the problems of
the near future.
No, they are using what we have today to get the answer out today, not 20
years from now like GM may be doing.
LOL, now who is naive. Conservation is the answer to today's problems and
anything that can assist in doing that is going in the right direction. The
only reason that GM is even thinking about fuel cell development is because
they are losing market share to companies that are building fuel efficient
vehicles and for that alone, it is completely worth it. Now if you have
some numbers to back up what you said I would be glad to see them. BTW,
even your fuel cell vehicles require batteries that use those same resources
that you are whining about with the hybrids.
None as far as I know. They haven't been around that long yet.
which were of
Once again, you talk out of your ass. Those old GM vehicles used HEAVY lead
acid batteries and some may have even tried NiCd which are a far cry from
the batteries of today. Perhaps you should do a little research there.
Please explain how in this global economy?
There is no benefit in using our own oil over that of others and if you
think that there is, explain how. As for developing newer energy sources,
it will only happen when there is a true need which would be either national
security or economic feasibility. You say that you look at both but in
reality, you only look at things that don't impact your lifestyle or require
anything from you.
But they serve a need for today. Future development is nothing but a gamble
and while it needs to be done, the short term also needs to be dealt with.
I find it funny that you accuse me of only looking long term and then defend
GM for doing exactly the same thing. The only real difference is that you
falsely accuse me of doing it while GM is actually doing it.
LOL, yea, sure. Please point me to some link that backs this up and
explains the difference between explatory and well drilling. You will
probably find in your search that they are the same damn thing.What they
did, IIRC, was sonic and seismic testing which revealed the possibikity of
oil but that is the bast that it can do. If they actually drilled as you
suggest, they would KNOW that there was iol, approximently how much and what
They know that something is different underground, not what or how much but
if I am wrong, please point me to a site that confirms what you are saying
for my education.
No, exploratory drilling confirms what the other test indicate and is
exactly the same as regular drilling without the pumping and transportation
infrastructure being completed.
Now that depends on exactly what infrastructure you are talking about.
Sorry Miles, but the one really squirming here is you and what does this
have to do with conservation and hybrids anyway?
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
You are the one that said gas guzzling SUV's are a problem and these
Japanese hybrids are a great solution. People who are buying hybrids
are not choosing them instead of an SUV. These hybrids are only
replacing other economy cars. The savings in fuel is peanuts.
If its a clunker then liability is fine. If its worth something then
possibly comprehensive is needed.
Whoa here TBone. First you discount the Ford because it won't be out
till later, then you use Toyota and Lexus as examples of SUV hybrids?
They won't be out for quite some time.
No. SUV Hybrids make more sense because they will replace those gas
guzzling SUV's you whine about. Hybrid cars you love are bought by
people who would have bought an econo car anyways. Little savings there
to save the world with TBone.
GM had its electric cars out many years before anyone else was doing a
How many 100,000 mile hybrids then? There are plenty that should have
been around long enough for that. They simply do not last that long.
Foreign dependency is never a good thing. If it is, then explain how it
causes no problems.
You liberals wont allow any type of exploring for oil. Period. Thats
the point. But you are still wrong. Exploratory drilling does not
require all the same infrastructure as a full blown drilling and pumping
It doesn't require a permanent drilling station to be built. Big
Ahh..now you back peddle a bit. You're trying to tell me nobody does
exploratory drilling because its the same as if they're drilling to pump
it anyways. Now its a matter of exactly what infrastructure? too funny.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.