Sad day for America

Vigorish, 'the take' that a bookie rakes off of the money he gets. He must be from somewhere around Chicago.

Charles Grozny

Reply to
charlesgrozny
Loading thread data ...

OK - thanks.

Reply to
Bill Putney

You thing wrong, Walgreens is not longer accepting Medicare part "D" prescriptions. Call them and see for yourself.

Reply to
Mike Hunter

You are wrong again, Washington is not the only state and it is not only new prescriptions.

Reply to
Mike Hunter

Let see if I have this right, 30,000,000 more people will be covered, including the most costly with pre-existing conditions, many will be subsidized and the gap in prescription drug coverage will be eliminated, businesses will be taxed more and they will NOT pass on that tax increase to the customer? If you believe that I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. LOL

Reply to
Mike Hunter

There's already discrimination. Congress is exempt.

Reply to
Conscience

Hah! I keep forgetting.

Reply to
Bill Putney

I'm guessing they're just sacrificing the benefits to pass them along to the needy.

Their being all benevolent and stuff.

Reply to
Conscience

Agreed. And will they be disappointed when all is said and done. The door has been kicked open for more taxes a coming.

I wonder how long it will take Obama to say my grossly negligent mispending is due to health care to justify a 5 to 8% national sales tax like GST or VAT. After all, governmetn needs more money big time, $1.7 trillion short this year with health care additive....

Taxes are going to go through the roof.

Reply to
Canuck57

How short were they before the bill was signed?

Reply to
Steve Stone

Some will just lay off employees and hire contract or not replace them. Or perhaps hire different back cheaper to compensate.

Sort of like the layoff rate is higher for above 45 years old than lower. Keeps them off the pension...as it is a ruse in trouble too.

If it is food, in demand, perhaps pass it on. Boats and cars are discretionary, thus no price increases there will float well.

Yep, Obama'mama bailouts...now trying to buy the poor vote with taxpayers money.

No > Let see if I have this right, 30,000,000 more people will be covered,

Reply to
Canuck57

Funny, now the truth comes out. You are on the dole. LMAO. And welcome to the real world, even on any plan you pay for glasses to some amount, and very little is covered.

Hey, you worshiped Obama for GM bailouts and corporate welfare, now he is vote buy> Get real! If you were really a MD, dr_jeff, you would know that is NOT so.

Reply to
Canuck57

I said additive. So add it's eventual cost to the $1.7 trillion already for 2010.

It is like brining home $4000 each month in net pay and spending $8,000 a month. How long can Obama do this? Not sure, but at some poin there will be hell to pay for Omanamonics, get rich on debt. Doesn't mater how you gut it, DC is like a car going 220mph straight for a brick wall and it is not going to be pretty.

Reply to
Canuck57

Give it 10 years, you will figure it out.

Reply to
Canuck57

Of course, and bet the civil service is too.

Reply to
Canuck57

Lets say the states, insurance companies, and middle class working peoples groups got together together for a massive class action against the US Congress. Get it into the surpreme court and see how much the consitution really means...

Might scare the hell out of every> Not Really the Pennsylvania AG is one more of the states Attorneys General

Reply to
Canuck57

Does that mean you're done? Good...

Reply to
Dave

The progressives consider the Constitution to be toilet paper.

Reply to
Jane Galt

Ironic.

The ACLU, their supporters, and their enablers in Congress have more respect and concern for the Quran copies in possession of Gitmo terrorists prisoner than they do our Constitution.

Reply to
Conscience

Completely like politicians of any other party. ;)

Not according to the number of political prisoners China has. You have to be either incredibly ignorant or extremely anti-American to say China's government is better the Obama administration.

It's not as important as you think. Most of those cars are for domestic sale, and China is still far behind in automotive technology. Think of it this way: It took South Korea 20 years to make competitive cars, and South Korea starting out with a far more developed and sophisticated technological base. China's best technology is DNA, something overlooked by almost everybody.

Your awe of China is eerily like how harles Lindbergh saw Germany in the 1930s -- superior to the US. He was wrong, and I hope you'll be proved wrong, too.

Reply to
larry moe 'n curly

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.