1. Home
  2. Land Rover 4WD vehicles
  3. 2 L/Rs for sale

2 L/Rs for sale

Advertised on behalf of a friend who is going home to Australia.

Lightweight V8, 4.0 Ltr engine built by VSE Jaguar specialist on Range Rover chassis, Holly carbs, tubular manifolds, stainless steel exhaust, rollbar, adjustable shocks, 5 speed gearbox. £1500

1964 Series 11a 101 forward control with flatbed conversion - featured in a 4 page spread in LRW magazine a while back. Salisbury rear axle, 2 1/4 diesel (needs some work). Its been lengthened and widened for flatbed. £1100

Both vehicles in N. Wales (Nr Dolgellau)

Sorry if a bit vague. Any more info needed phone Steve James 01766 540367 (and mention Gary)

Reply to
James Taylor
Loading thread data ...

Forgot to say this one has 5? months mot, no tax

This has no mot, tax exempt

Reply to
James Taylor

Is it really a 2a FC 101? I thought that the 2a FC's were 109 - Or has it been shortened?

Reply to
Tom Woods

this isn't THE james taylor that's written all the landrover books is it????

Reply to
samuel mcgregor

On or around Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:28:57 +0100, Tom Woods enlightened us thusly:

that's what i was about to say. it's more likely to be a 109", and if it's a 2A not a 2B, then it's the one with frightening handling and minimal brakes, or that's how someone reported it once :-)

the 2B apparently had uprated springs and brake servos and stuff.

Reply to
Austin Shackles

Don't start that again again!!!

Reply to
James Taylor

I liked the one that one of the mags had in that was 88". Ive always preferred SWB stuff.

Is the 2B also 109", or was it longer at 110"?.

Reply to
Tom Woods

Unlikely - as the main proponent of the previous silliness is currently 'away' :-)

Reply to
Mother

You're not wrong Tom, 110" it says on my bulkhead plate, 1968 though.

Martin

Reply to
Oily

There is some justice then.

Reply to
James Taylor

Sorry I can't help with that one - I just took the info from a copy of a scan.

Reply to
James Taylor

I've been revising! :)

Reply to
Tom Woods

That'll be all landrovers then!

Reply to
SimonJ

On or around Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:15:18 +0000 (UTC), "SimonJ" enlightened us thusly:

my 110 handles and brakes amazingly well for a 2-ton brick. seriously, I've had cars which aren't as stable at 50-60 around corners, and which didn't stop any better either.

Reply to
Austin Shackles

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.