I miss my Disco

I Traded my '94 Disco 300 TDi a while ago and now regret it. (Big Time!)

I am now considering a 1998 Range Rover 4.0 SE Auto with LPG. I'm sure i'll get some negative advice as well as positive so come on, what do I look out for? What's good, what's bad? Should I look for another Disco instead?

Rob

Reply to
Robbiedoo
Loading thread data ...

I'd consider buying one without LPG & getting it converted yourself. There are some very poor conversions about, as I'm fast finding out to my cost!!

I've had one two weeks now, Only had the A/C to fix. As well as LPG.. not yet sorted

Ged

Reply to
Ged

So do I. It has been away for three weeks now gettings its second egine rebuild in six months!

Regards Stephen

Reply to
fanie

Er, 2nd in 6 months, who did the first one?

:0)

`Mark

Reply to
Mark

Bought my 96 ES V8i off Ebay for £4300 ready converted and it has not missed a beat!!

I would definitely get a disco over a RR due to the slipped liner problem being much less prone to happen on a 3.9 than any other due to the ECU fuel mapping.

I also have a 300Tdi but that's for sale now due to me never driving it - the sound of the V8 through a custom built stainless exhaust sounds fantastic - and at 28 - 30 Mpg eqiuiv its cheap

Reply to
StaffBull

Thanks Ged

I'm looking at one that's ready converted, sounds like I need to know who by and then check them out. Hope you get yours sorted soon.

Rob

Reply to
Robbiedoo

Thanks Staffbull

Actually I prefer the RR so I'll take a look and see but you have worried me a little with this slipped liner business. I suppose there's no pattern to it, nor can you tell when it is likely to happen or better still prevent it?

Rob

Reply to
Robbiedoo

On or around Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:49:37 GMT, "Robbiedoo" enlightened us thusly:

bigger engines are more prone, ISTR. 3.9 less likely than 4.6, style of fing.

Reply to
Austin Shackles

If the disco's are less prone than the rr's then can the rr ecu be changed for or altered to similar to, the disco ecu? thus solving the problem.

Regards. Mark.

Reply to
MVP

On or around Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:17:11 +0100, MVP enlightened us thusly:

that's a good point, and I don't know the answer. The system is nominally the same, AFAIK. 'course, the problem may be to do with other aspects like cooling - I know Sister's BF had loads of problems with cooling on his 3.9 RR, which he solved eventually by removing the aircon radiator - presumably, though, that disables the aircon.

Reply to
Austin Shackles

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.