The focus of this project is the maintenance of the integrity of the two security functions, namely immobilization and alarm, while the owner has to leave the car untended for 3 months, as I read it. It is not primarily for keeping the car battery in tip top condition. That is why I feel the coincidental or secondary function of these memory savers, namely, "may also be used for maintaining a charged battery in good condition during vehicle storage" (quoting the Gunson's explanatory note), is just the right tool for the job. In fact, to automatically recharging the battery to keep it in good condition, in the OP's objective, is in this instance of secondary importance; a battery conditioner is not called for. You are right: memory savers are not battery chargers. And, you are also right that battery conditioners are expensive.